The Pentagon's 9/11... a conspiracy? [merged]

I'm too new to allow links yet, so I'll just type this one in and you can cut and paste in your browser, but you HAVE to see this because it's just mind-blowing.
Michael Moore opened the doors with Fahrenheit/911, and this just adds a lot more fuel to the fire about the plane that hit the Pentagon.
Was it really a 757? Or was it a little Cessna carrying 8-12 people?
You be the judge......
add the www before you enter this:
freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php#Main

I think this is more suited for the General Discussion forum

hmm I wathced it if true they make a good case, but does it really matter what hit the pentagon?

our teacher was talking about that, how it might have been a plan made by the american government, i don't really have an opinion myself though

hmm I wathced it if true they make a good case, but does it really matter what hit the pentagon?

i think it was either a small jet or a missile.
imo, 2 possible reasons for u.s. government lying:

-they were forced to shoot down a 747 and lied about it...which would be
really stupid, since shooting down a plane with a couple of hundred people
to save the lives of a couple of THOUSAND people would be a rational transaction...so why lie about this?

-the pentagon was hit by a missile and the government lied about it to avoid panic. whatever hit the pentagon was at an extreemly high speed, considering it penetrated all buildings (4?) within the structure, maintaining the same shape hole through every one...plus no pieces were found, except for a bit of debris here and there, no bigger than a basketball. planes leave tons of wreakage, no matter how severe the crash. and this 'thing' left very little. could it have been a long range missle test by the enemy? if so, you can bet your ass we would be lied to about it...

i think the second would answer a previous poster's question on whether it matters what hit the pentagon. it very much matters

There is a point where they show some INTACT windows. There is a perfectly good explanation for this. The windows in the pentagon are coated with a security window film. This film is manufactured by a company in Martinsville Virginia. The fil hold the glass in place in the event of a bomb blast or the like. As far as the cable spools are concerned what does that prove? that part of the pentagon had just been reenforced and they were more than likely on the roof or something. During a catastrophy you get a lot of " EYE WITNESSES" that just want there face on TV. This is a bogus site. WE WERE ATTACKED PEOPLE.

i never argued that we were attacked, i just think the method by which the pentagon was attacked is being kept secret to avoid...i dont know...panic?...suspicion?...who knows but the powers that be?

the official explanation states also the the plane dragged along the lawn before impact, yet the lawn was perfectly intact. also, any and all videos taken by witnesses were confiscated...and never seen again.

think about it, would the government ever openly state that the enemy successfully hit our top military building with a long range missile? hell no.
and why is it that they all of the sudden want to invest billions in a missile defense system...i thought the real threat was a nuke in a van, or a briefcase...what happened that told our government that balistic missiles are still a grave thread to us?

Great! a modern day "Who shot Kennedy" Conspiracy theory.

Originally posted by finti
off course it does matter

and why?

I mean c'mon do you seriously give a damn wether or not it was a plane or a missile?

you seriously think it was a long range ballistic missile?

and why?

If the EU parliament blew up , besides applauding that event, wouldnt you wanna know if it was a bomb that blew it up or a accidental gas explotion ( the swedish representative had eaten some crummy bacon and beans and lit a siggaret while sitting at the can)

True, but that's because I care for the EU Parliament I don't care for the Pentagon. you are right the public and certainly the relatives have a right to know altho I don't see the need to give this info out to ppl out-side the US since it doesn't concern them.

I'd put my money on a small plane certainly not a long range ballistic Missile

the relatives have a right to know altho I don't see the need to give this info out to ppl out-side the US since it doesn't concern them.

I think every country has it's militairy secrets finti even norway

I think every country has it's militairy secrets finti even norway

Originally posted by PVS
i think it was either a small jet or a missile.
imo, 2 possible reasons for u.s. government lying:

-they were forced to shoot down a 747 and lied about it...which would be
really stupid, since shooting down a plane with a couple of hundred people
to save the lives of a couple of THOUSAND people would be a rational transaction...so why lie about this?

-the pentagon was hit by a missile and the government lied about it to avoid panic. whatever hit the pentagon was at an extreemly high speed, considering it penetrated all buildings (4?) within the structure, maintaining the same shape hole through every one...plus no pieces were found, except for a bit of debris here and there, no bigger than a basketball. planes leave tons of wreakage, no matter how severe the crash. and this 'thing' left very little. could it have been a long range missle test by the enemy? if so, you can bet your ass we would be lied to about it...
think the second would answer a previous poster's question on whether it matters what hit the pentagon. it very much matters

planes travely at extremely high speeds.. expecailly while going down.

We already had two threads on this same exact thing.

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pentagon.html#Main

That was the basic topic. Woo.

Originally posted by Fire
you seriously think it was a long range ballistic missile?

i think it COULD have been. rescently bush has proposed a missile defense system, which many strike down as 'impractical' in a post coldwar world...but what if it isnt? and if it WAS a missile, do you think that info would be disclosed?

and to another poster, if you believe in the 'magic bullet' and that kennedy was only shot by oswald..i have a bridge i think you may be interested in buying 😛

I'd qualify this as a militairy secret 😛

I seriously doubt there are Terrorist organisations out there that have the capability to launch Long Range Ballistic Missiles. Secondly I don't think an LRBM could fly horizontaly a few ft above the ground, except a very very Hi-Tech one, and I doubt it even more that Terrorist organisations have those.