Wolverine vs. Phantom Bone Theory
We all know the score here.
And for those of you who don't. It's been argued in many a thread that one tactic for beating Wolverine in a forum battle is by breaking his neck, ripping him apart, or otherwise comprimising his bone structure for the win.
For years Wolverine supporters have argued that Wolverine can't be ripped apart, that his bones have been bonded on the molecular level but somehow still allow for movement.
Because of this argumentation, we are lead to the second part of this story where Wolverine has had his brain penetrated by bullets, and arrows, but each time having been by a method impossible to replicate on a human skull were it covered with Adamantium.
Some camps believe that if Wolverine's skeletal structure is different enough to be impossible to pull apart, then it's different enough to argue that he's missing bones allowing for these instances to take place.
Some camps argue that these instances are nothing more than PIS based on general misconceptions of the human anatomy and that if Wolverine were missing pieces of his skull and/or other body parts it would have been mentioned by now.
Whatever the case may be, it's a hard case to call with evidence on both sides of the fence... Let's see which side is more convincing.