Infinity VS. Gog

Originally posted by whirlysplat
😕 a 😕 ll science is the 😕 oretica 😕 l even the stuff which works 😕 🙄 I know 🙄 i'm a scientist (actually true) 😄

Even Laws are theories and open to revision in science

Infinity. Gog would have trouble with Thanos much less Infinity.

Originally posted by Cosmic Cube
No. It isn't. That's why there are theories, and laws.

laws are theories open to revision.

Newtonian Physics is based on laws, Quantum mechanics is based on probability. The laws of Newtonian physics do not work on the very large or the very small. E.g. in a black hole everything goes infinite. An electron can be anywhere and everywhere around the nucleus of an atom in any of the shells or sub shells. Please don't argue on this CC its not like Doom v Doomsday anyone who knows Science reading this thread will laugh at you. 😮 😄

Originally posted by whirlysplat
laws are theories open to revision.

Newtonian Physics is based on laws, Quantum mechanics is based on probability. The laws of Newtonian physics do not work on the very large or the very small. E.g. in a black hole everything goes infinite. An electron can be anywhere and everywhere around the nucleus of an atom in any of the shells or sub shells. Please don't argue on this CC its not like Doom v Doomsday anyone who knows Science reading this thread will laugh at you. 😮 😄

Theories are open to revision. Laws are not. Educate yourself.

Black holes are theoretical. Nothing about them is law.

You're being very arrogant. I know quite a bit about physics. Don't insult my intelligence. 😄

Gog was destroying the multiverse He might have a chance at defeating Infinity and even if He does lose its not a shameful thing She is a cosmic level being like Eternity still He might win 🙂

Gog was destroying the multiverse? When? 🙂

Those laws are made up by humans there not totally and utterly undisputable a black hole has gravity so strong it sucks in light and even slows down time does that make sense in any laws? No but none the less it happens.

Originally posted by Mider
Those laws are made up by humans there not totally and utterly undisputable a black hole has gravity so strong it sucks in light and even slows down time does that make sense in any laws? No but none the less it happens.

Black holes haven't even been proven to exist. They are theoretical.

The Laws of Thermodynamics/Conservation of Mass/etc. is indisputable, except by God. But you'd have to actually know the laws to know whether they're disputable of not.

In Kingdom so ive heard.

Originally posted by Mider
In Kingdom so ive heard.

Originally posted by Cosmic Cube
Black holes haven't even been proven to exist. They are theoretical.

The Laws of Thermodynamics/Conservation of Mass/etc. is indisputable, except by God. But you'd have to actually know the laws to know whether they're disputable of not.

I am afraid you are wrong here is an example of a law being revised

http://physics.about.com/cs/alternativeideas/a/unification_rk_2.htm 🙄

I rest my case

And the use of the word "tends" by Newton in the first law of motion should have got you wise to things anyway 😄

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/newton3laws.html

heres the clincher

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1984ApJ...286....3F&db_key=AST

Milgroms "revision" of Newtons laws where he looks at the problem of momentum in isolated systems not beind conserved as Newtons law states it must be.

Sorry mate 😮 you look silly now

Originally posted by whirlysplat
I am afraid you are wrong here is an example of a law being revised

http://physics.about.com/cs/alternativeideas/a/unification_rk_2.htm 🙄

I rest my case

And the use of the word "tends" by Newton in the first law of motion should have got you wise to things anyway 😄

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/newton3laws.html

heres the clincher

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1984ApJ...286....3F&db_key=AST

Milgroms "revision" of Newtons laws where he looks at the problem of momentum in isolated systems not beind conserved as Newtons law states it must be.

Sorry mate 😮 you look silly now

Oh and finally heres Einsteins violation of the second law of thermodynamics bottom of the page because it didn't fit with his superior model of the universe:

http://physics.about.com/cs/alternativeideas/a/unification_rk_3.htm

All these ideas are open to change!

Look up the word epistomology to see how science works
😱

You still look silly 😮 chin up 😄

Originally posted by whirlysplat
Not at all Gog would lose this.It doesn't make Infinity any more sensible 🙄

Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
When you personify an abstract, they can't help but be extremely powerful.

Good point Swanky thats why a being like Q works better, the concept is still abstract the being is not 😄

Originally posted by Beyonder
Infinity. Gog would have trouble with Thanos much less Infinity.

Infinity whould own.

Yes Infinity would win doesn't makeCC's understanding of science any better though. check out the preacher v infinity to see her lose!!!

Originally posted by whirlysplat
Good point Swanky thats why a being like Q works better, the concept is still abstract the being is not 😄

Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
I think it was an accident that Q ended up so awesome though.

In what sense, no sarcasm i'm interested

Originally posted by whirlysplat
In what sense, no sarcasm i'm interested

Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
I don't mean power-wise. I mean popularity wise. You can't plan that magic, baby!

True i don't see him used on this forum though 😄