You are the one who is posting nonsese, cinemaadicction. Lets see, basically, any talented actor could play a part in a historical movie, but it depends on which actor , which part and which movie we are talking about. Its a too generic question to anwser serioulsy.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
Gender: Male Location: The Faroe Islands - Thorshavn
Ya the arthur plot has been done many times, my personal fav is Excalibur that was made in the 80's, anyway most of the new once like Troy, Alexander(only been done once that I know of), and Gladiator, Braveheart, kingdom Of Heaven aint movies that the plot has been overdone, infact I cajnt recall any other movies about William wallace, or one about Saladin and the fight around Jerusalem, or the only one that I've seen with Emporer Commodeus is the Fall Of the Roman empire, a few about Troy but mostly all sucked, the new one is by far the best, andAlexander as I said above has only been done once, if not once then I'm pretty sure the other once sucked
Maybe there shouldn`t be well-established actors in such films....
__________________ Yet the lies that Melkor, the mighty and accursed, Morgoth Bauglir, the Power of Terror and of Hate, sowed in the hearts of Elves and Men are a seed that does not die and cannot be destroyed; and ever and anon it sprouts anew, and will bear dark fruit even unto the latest days.
"… his name is Melkor, Lord of All, Giver of Freedeom, and he shall make you stronger than they."
Sauron to Ar-Pharazôn
Gender: Male Location: The Faroe Islands - Thorshavn
well as somebody said before, acturly almust all actors could play a historical figure, maybe not some hotshot like William Wallace, but still some historical person, like some wise mathematichian or some dude that inveted stuff or maybe used 100% of his time writing poetry, so in a way all could play historical figures
Why if they were making a movie about Napoleone and the wars he waged.
Who would be better in his role, who would show better what a man Napoleone was ? ( I've posted this question because some said that depends on the time and subject of the action in these movies)
Gender: Male Location: The Faroe Islands - Thorshavn
Napoleon, well there already is a movie about him, its acturly a fantastic mini series, I saw infact just the other day, I bought the DVD, it runs for 6 hours, and was made in 2002, and it ranks as the most expansive European movie ever, its very good I suggest you watch it, John Malchowich plays in it, along with that guy Garrad Depature, or something like that, but the guy that plays Napoleon is called Christian Clavier, anyway look here, I'd give this movie a 8.7 stars out of 10, its very good. though one thing would have been awesome it's if the man himself Stanley Kubrick would have made this movie, i got the scrip for it somewere on my pc, havint read it though, I plan to very soon, I also still need to see the documentry about Stanley Kubrick I think they disscuss somes tuff about why it was never mande or soemthing, would have been awesome.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 18th, 2005 09:57 AM
I would say alan rickman or sean connery, but definately alan rickman.
