Gender: Male Location: Chaos.
There can only be CHAOS!
I don't like Hulk, any of it. And Kes, you're right about the CGI being cruddy. It is. Whoop de do, a giant green thing can jump really high from a distance. Herr Logan, this isn't a Hulk forum, this is a Movie Discussion forum, accept the fact that people can have negative opinions about a movie too.
I only told Kes she had no valid imput on this because she clearly doesn't. The story of the movie was mediocre at best, but I thought she was referring to the original Hulk story (spanning 1963 to the present), since she posted that after there was discussion about how the movie deviated from the original story. If she watched the movie and thought it sucked, she's perfectly valid in that. Not because she is "entitled to her opinion," which is childish nonsense, but because it's an reasonable opinion backed up by actually having seen the movie. If she is referring to the basic idea of the Hulk, in any medium, then she hasn't looked for anything decently written with the Hulk in it. There is solid, thoughtful subject matter in the Hulk's story to be used in a movie, and MY beef with the film is that it failed to do that. I never said the movie's story was any good.
I hope this clears things up, but since I unfortunately have a very disorganized way of writing and speaking, many intelligent people get confused when I explain things. That in mind, I doubt that you could follow along much at all.
__________________
I'm the best there is at what I do, but what I do isn't very nice.
I've told you bashing is not allowed, cut it out. This is a warning!
And I wasnt talking about the movie, I was talking about a guy getting angry, turning green and grow I dont know how much. I think its stupid regardless of how well some comics are written. I simply do not like it.
"Spider-Man" wasn't overrated, it was just that it had a safe, worldwide appeal, just like "Titanic".
People tend to call movies that appeal to a wide range, thus making alot of money, "overrated".
Truth be told, Spiderman didn't fair well with critics, only because it was one of the 1st true comic book movies with A list actors, and a nationally recognizable lead figure. These kinds of movies will never get really rave reviews.
Kes, that's fair, I suppose. How exactly is "the X-Files" any better, though? Or "X-Men" for that matter? By the way, David Duchovny may be the next Hulk.
__________________
I'm the best there is at what I do, but what I do isn't very nice.
Big surprise. You really don't have much with which to reply at all except "no bashing" and "everyone is entitled to their opinions," do you? You give just enough mental effort to protest everything I say, but that's where it stops. You don't put any thought into justifying your viewpoint. I think it's laziness in your case, not stupidity. It's your choice. If it floats your boat to act oppressive without any insight or logic, fine. It's you who has to live with that.
__________________
I'm the best there is at what I do, but what I do isn't very nice.
I'd like to see Duchovny as Banner. I'd also like to see some of Eric Bana's stand up stuff. I reckon he could be quite a funny guy. He excelled in "Chopper".
__________________
Post in the Indiana Jones forum.
1st I didnt reply because it is obvious how the x files is better!And it would just turn into a fight.
2nd it is off topic.
3rd I've had it with you!
Who the **** do you think you are???You dont know me.
KMC Community Forums
Feb 29th, 2004 04:40 PM
