Galactus lacks "Galactus' durability", since everyone from BRB (3-punch KOed by Surfer) to Thor, has managed to dent/fracture or shatter a part of his headdress with a direct charge/slam.
That still didn't stop Odin from KOing himself with a similar tactic to the heralds, only with his superior girth he ended up inflicting more pain on himself than he intended to.
GLT would doubtless shrug it off and it would take far more - orders of magnitude more - power than Odin has to do enough damage to GLT to make it retreat, if that's what you're thinking.
Thor did so with Mjolnir, whose blunt force strikes are confirmed planet busters. Not sure what you're trying to prove with the BRB instance though, as Galactus was weakened iirc in that instance.
Wrong. GLT lacks the power or the fortitude to compete with the 616-universe's top skyfather.
The Galaxy buster is about as real as some of Abhi's superman feats.
If it's the whole "lit up dead galaxies" thing, then that's worse than Savage Hulk's punch that rippled through infinite worlds at the nexus of all realities.
Are you really suggesting that Mjolnir > Odin when it comes to durability and force (Odin being unable to retain consciousness being roughly akin to Mjolnir shattering, it seems)?
GLT may be one of the least impressive Galactus clones in the omniverse, but he is a Galactus clone and thus a whole order of power higher than a planetary skyfather.
There's no point in arguing ABC logic here. Galactus was able to one-shot Thanos when they fought. There's no need to bring Tyrant into the comparison.
Odin's feats as a whole are superior to Gah Lak Tus, and it being a poor man's 616 Galactus doesn't mean it should get the benefit of the doubt because of which character it's based off of.
Not "trolling" (why are people so intent on being humourless when it comes to religion and comics?), just pointing out the obvious bias that is required to say "Odin wins" when he's pitted against another universe's Galactus.
Remember, Galactus is both an entity and a position/function/role. A being that is a part of Eternity and is fundamental to the universe within which it resides.
Odin isn't and doesn't carry the cachet to swing victories merely on his feats. He's an impressive skyfather and out of his league in the big wide cosmos.
Galactus is one such being that has the benefit of having both importance status and having great feats as well. He has low feats, too, but that's expected.
Basically, it seems like you're projecting Galactus' status/power onto his Ultimate counterpart just because....well, just because. Gah Lak Tus doesn't get a pass just because "it's an alt. Galactus!". If/when he gets feats beyond Odin's scope, sure, but to date, it sure as shit doesn't and there's nothing biased about pointing that out.
The irony. Did a large Norwegian man take your virginity? Having trouble understanding your contempt for all things Asgardian. Or is it because Thor routinely one-ups Surfer in their conflicts?
When has a Herald knocked out Galactus stone cold with a headbutt?
And how are you even comparing the Bill scene to the Odin scene? Are you on crack?
KMC Community Forums
Jul 20th, 2013 06:55 PM
