-Pr-
Hey Yo!
Gender: Male Location: Ireland.
Moderator
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bentley
Powerful enough to be beheaded by Cyclops and Wolverine.
==
Seriously though, I'd pick Stewart to win, personally. Feats like the bullet are high outliers, not the standard.
__________________
Jul 27th, 2013 08:33 PM
TheLordofMurder
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheGodKiller
^Which is still good enough by most standards.
Says the guy who emails physics professors with battleboard-centric questions.
The highest scale at which Strong Force operates is the nuclear level. Which is barely a couple of femtometers.
Thats far enough to hold an atomic nucleus together though...isnt it?
__________________
Jul 27th, 2013 08:33 PM
ares834
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Thats far enough to hold an atomic nucleus together though...isnt it?
Yes, it is. But it's not what bonds atoms together.
Jul 27th, 2013 08:37 PM
janus77
Banana Genius
Gender: Male Location: United Kingdom
Magneto's almost as poweful as Uri Geller!
__________________
Are you a Glinting Bastard?
Jul 27th, 2013 08:37 PM
Philosophía
"The devil made me do it"
Gender: Male Location: Void
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
You're my favorite hero.
(please log in to view the image)
__________________
“Perhaps this is the ultimate freedom. The freedom to leave.”
Jul 27th, 2013 08:41 PM
TheLordofMurder
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by ares834
Yes, it is. But it's not what bonds atoms together.
It absolutely is...
Now note, I am talking about the structure of a single atom; not ionic bonds between multiple atoms...
At the scale of a single atom, the electromagnetic force keeps the electrons in orbit, while the strong force glues together the nucleus...
That, gentlemen, is 100% correct...
__________________
Jul 27th, 2013 08:41 PM
janus77
Banana Genius
Gender: Male Location: United Kingdom
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
It absolutely is...
Now note, I am talking about the structure of a single atom; not ionic bonds between multiple atoms...
At the scale of a single atom, the electromagnetic force keeps the electrons in orbit, while the strong force glues together the nucleus...
That, gentlemen, is 100% correct...
That physics stuff, it's science innit?
I don't believe in science.
If science was real we'd all be travelling in flying cars and going back in time to screw Marty's mother...
__________________
Are you a Glinting Bastard?
Jul 27th, 2013 08:46 PM
ares834
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
It absolutely is...
Now note, I am talking about the structure of a single atom; not ionic bonds between multiple atoms...
At the scale of a single atom, the electromagnetic force keeps the electrons in orbit, while the strong force glues together the nucleus...
That, gentlemen, is 100% correct...
Sure, but you refuted Srank's post where he said bonds, obviously he is talking about shit like ionic and covalent bonds, are held together by electromagnetism... And he was right.
Jul 27th, 2013 08:47 PM
TheLordofMurder
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by ares834
Sure, but you refuted Srank's post where he said bonds, obviously he is talking about shit like ionic and covalent bonds, are held together by electromagnetism... And he was right.
No...
He said that electromagnetism bonds matter together; that is false...
Almost all of an atoms mass is in the nucleus and that nucleus is held together by the strong force; his statement is false as a result...
__________________
Jul 27th, 2013 08:54 PM
TheLordofMurder
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
Look at elements with complete outer valence shells; no ionic bonds needed...
What holds them together?
Hint...it sure as hell aint the electromagnetic force...
__________________
Jul 27th, 2013 08:56 PM
ares834
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States
lol
It does bond matter together... It might not be the only force involved, but it does. The fact that he specifically used the word "bond" and then mentions atoms scattering makes it clear what he was talking about.
Jul 27th, 2013 08:57 PM
srankmissingnin
VP of Comic Knowledge
Gender: Male Location: Canada
quote: (post ) Originally posted by ares834
lol
It does bond matter together... It might not be the only force involved, but it does. The fact that he specifically used the word "bond" and then mentions atoms scattering makes it clear what he was talking about.
I thought I was being pretty clear... I guess not though. /shrug
__________________
Play League of Legends for free and reference me - GentlemanZombie - when you join
Jul 27th, 2013 09:05 PM
abhilegend
Prince of All Saiyans
Gender: Male Location: Always second place
quote: (post ) Originally posted by iceman24567
His powers were unstable
That doesn't mean he was any less powerful than normal.quote: (post ) Originally posted by Magnon
Magneto's power fluctuates, that's why I said full power. When he is in peak physical shape his powers also function at full power. That is when he *constantly* performs at high-herald/team-buster level. It's not just some occasional high-end feats. But I agree that *currently* he is not quite high-herald.
Even at full power he isn't a high herald.quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheGodKiller
^Which is still good enough by most standards.
Says the guy who emails physics professors with battleboard-centric questions.
The highest scale at which Strong Force operates is the nuclear level. Which is barely a couple of femtometers. quote: (post ) Originally posted by abhilegend
Nope.
I was joking.
If we place high heralds on a few high end feats, nearly everybody in herald tier would be high herald.
__________________
Jul 28th, 2013 03:29 AM
TheGodKiller02
True Killer
Gender: Male Location: Hunting with wolves
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Thats far enough to hold an atomic nucleus together though...isnt it?
You do know how small the nucleus is compared to the whole atom, don't you?
__________________
Jul 28th, 2013 05:44 PM
Magnon
Senior Member
Gender: Location: Finland
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Magnon
Electromagnetism IS what holds atoms and molecules together: the electrically negative electrons and positive nuclei attract each other (Coulomb's Law etc.). Strong force has nothing to do with it, it is what keeps quarks together in protons etc.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
No...
Over 99.999% of an atoms mass in contained in the nucleus and that nucleus is held together by the strong force...
Electromagnetism keeps that electrons in orbit, but thats about it...
The discussion was about scattering atoms. Since the bonds between atoms are electromagnetic in nature, your reply to srank was unambiguously wrong and had to be corrected. Electromagnetism binds atoms together, in the form of covalent, ionic or metallic bonds (or intermolecular forces), and a sufficiently powerful control over electromagnetism would indeed allow one to scatter those atoms apart.
Strong force binds quarks into protons and neutrons and, further, binds those particles together to form atomic nuclei. But you don't have to break the nuclei apart in order to break the bonds between atoms and scatter them.
However, if you want to break the nuclei themselves that can also be arranged through the control of electromagnetism. The reason for radioactive decay of nuclei is that the electromagnetic repulsion between the positively charged protons overcomes the strong nuclear force trying to keep the nucleus together.
Jul 28th, 2013 06:18 PM
TheLordofMurder
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You do know how small the nucleus is compared to the whole atom, don't you?
The size of the atom as a whole doesnt matter as the spaces between electron orbits are just that; empty space...
Over 99.999% of the atoms mass is in that tiny nucleus so thats what matters the most...
__________________
Jul 28th, 2013 06:20 PM
wolverinos
Restricted
Gender: Location:
Account Restricted
he is not that powerful when there arent any metals around now isnt he??? ha??
Jul 28th, 2013 06:28 PM
nikfang
Member
Gender: Location: Barbados
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
The size of the atom as a whole doesnt matter as the spaces between electron orbits are just that; empty space...
Over 99.999% of the atoms mass is in that tiny nucleus so thats what matters the most...
But if you take away the electrons the Atom will become unstable.
Jul 28th, 2013 06:35 PM
TheGodKiller02
True Killer
Gender: Male Location: Hunting with wolves
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
The size of the atom as a whole doesnt matter as the spaces between electron orbits are just that; empty space...
Over 99.999% of the atoms mass is in that tiny nucleus so thats what matters the most...
Yup, scattering atoms is clearly mass manipulation.
Gtfo here with your purposeful misinterpretation of srank's theoretical hyperbole.
__________________
Jul 28th, 2013 07:01 PM
TheLordofMurder
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Yup, scattering atoms is clearly mass manipulation.
Gtfo here with your purposeful misinterpretation of srank's theoretical hyperbole.
Dude, you dont even know what you are talking about; there is no "purposeful" misinterpretation of sranks statement...
He stated that electromagnetism bonds matter together; this is false...no if's, and's, or but's about it.
__________________
Jul 28th, 2013 07:34 PM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version