I don't give a shit about any writer's mistakes by default making feats bigger.
Just like I wouldn't argue anymore the writer's intent in World's Funnest,
which was a single Multiverse that Mxy affected in total.
But, since DC cosmology was more than that, by default Mxy's feat expands.
------------------------------------------------------------
If Ewing decided to retcon it to "A" multiverse later on, whatevs,
but in the story of Owen's feat, it was an Omniverse.
In Marvel, that's an infinite amount of MultiverseS. 👆
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Owen put an omniverse in a shoe box
And phuk! that "visualization" bullshit.
It was the previous Omniverse,
and Owen simply had the power to turn it into a smaller than shoe-boxed sized object.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Owen put an omniverse in a shoe box, thats far anybody including mxy pay grade
Mxy destroyed an Omniverse, then brought it back with a SNAP. Recently, we have seen a weakened Mxy about to destroy ALL of creation, including the pencil that was drawing the books. Waaaaay above Owen's pay grade.
Originally posted by Mr Masternope it was a multiverse. omniverse and multiverse mean the exact same thing under al ewing. even hickman had all of marvel as A multiverse in the preceeding story.....which is what ewing built from
=If Ewing decided to retcon it to "A" multiverse later on, whatevs,
but in the story of Owen's feat, it was [b]an Omniverse
.In Marvel, that's an infinite amount of MultiverseS. 👆
👆 ... But now it's being low-balled by kmc low-ballers to "multiverse."
And phuk! that "visualization" bullshit.
It was the previous Omniverse,
and Owen simply had the power to turn it into a smaller than shoe-boxed sized object. [/B]
and the multiverse owen showed galactus wasnt even real. it was just a representation of the last multiverse.
period 🙂
Originally posted by DeadpoolXXX
it wasnt even a real multiverse. it was just a representation of one. current owen was killed by a being who FEARED franklins universal power.why is everything that doesnt agree with you automatically "lowballing" or "trolling" or "biased". pardon us for mentioning on panel material that you are unaware of lol.
I mean, for some reason these marvel people think a visual representation of an omniverse in the box
means he put an actual omniverse inside a box
LMAO
It's like me holding a globe on my palm, and say "there's an earth on my hand, and that earth died....etc"
And for some reason...they think that feat is better than
Mxy destroying/recreating everything there ever was and ever will be of the entire DC
because why the phuck not, LOL
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilno you guys are trying to use omniverse to mean "infinite multiverses"....which was not ewings or hickmans intent. according to them the previous marvel cosmology was A multiverse. singular, to mean "infinite universes"
It's the exact same thing. Nothing I said was wrong
but like i said the multiverse in owens shoe box wasnt even real. current owen does not have that kind of power. if he did he wouldn't have been killed by a UNIVERSE LEVEL power recently.
No one gives a shit about ignorance.
Scans of it being noted Owen's Omniverse (infinite MultiverseS) was not real.
Originally posted by Senor Cage
Mxy destroyed an Omniverse, then brought it back with a SNAP.
Where was that term used in the story btw?
I'm flexible, I've seen stories where "universe" means everything,
but you're being quite specific, so I'm wondering.
"an" (requires a description)
Originally posted by MrMind👆
I mean, for some reason these marvel people think a visual representation of an omniverse in the boxmeans he put an actual omniverse inside a box
LMAO
It's like me holding a globe on my palm, and say "there's an earth on my hand, and that earth died....etc"
And for some reason...they think that feat is better than
Mxy destroying/recreating everything there ever was and ever will be of the entire DC
because why the phuck not, LOL
some people just cant be happy if their pet characters are debunked lol
Originally posted by Mr Masterscans of it being noted that owens omniverse contained infinite multiverses? scans of it being noted that marvel was even intended to have infinite multiverses under hickman or ewing? because it is stated SEVERAL times that marvel was A multiverse under both writers.
Scans of it being noted Owen's Omniverse (infinite MultiverseS) was not real.
stop pretending that these characters are more powerful then they are. we can all see through your cropped scans lol
Originally posted by MrMind
I mean, for some reason these marvel people think a visual representation of an omniverse in the boxmeans he put an actual omniverse inside a box
LMAO
Now post the scans where it's stated or explained Owen was fantasizing/lying or delusional.
Originally posted by MrMind
It's like me holding a globe on my palm,
and say "there's an earth on my hand, and that earth died....etc"
Originally posted by MrMind
And for some reason...they think that feat is better thanMxy destroying/recreating everything there ever was and ever will be of the entire DC
because why the phuck not, LOL
So, Owen is incapable of destroying the Omniverse he manipulated into a shoe-boxed sized object?
So, he can dwindle Infinite MultiverseS down to a show box size,
but somehow would have difficulty going further?
Wait
Originally posted by MrMind
LMAO
next page, it's completely cleared to us that owen is just showing visual representations of different shits for giggles