quote: (post)

Originally posted by vader11
Destroyed all life on the plantet with a single attack? Can Luke even do that?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Advent


That's largely irrelevant.

Janus X's insinuation was simply because a planet is capable of holding "millions/billions" that it does, and thusly that's the amount he drained. The fact that Tatooine doesn't hold that, or that there are not that many inhabitants leads one to believe that it's not necessarily the case.

How does any of what you're saying suggest that they numbered even in the millions? It doesn't. We don't have to consider anything, in fact, because the amount of Miraluka were not specified.

Galantos is also where the Fia (a sentient species) reside at, yet they have half a million in terms of their population (source: Coruscant and the Core Worlds). Aside from the fact that the planet itself is locationed in the Core Worlds, along a trade route. So, you really don't have a point. [/B]

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Allankles
My point was simply that Tatooine's population shouldn't be a marker for planets without the population densities of Corellia and Coruscant

quote:

Besides, it wasn't just the Miraluka that were killed but every living organism.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Advent


No one said that it was, I was simply demonstrating that because a planet may be able to hold millions or billions, that it necessarily isn't the case. Which I've stated. Tatooine was only an example, as I gave another, Galantos. It has nothing to do with being a "marker".

And you also tried to somehow suggest that the numbers may have not been so low due to the fact it was "home to an entire race", which doesn't hold true in the least bit.



I don't recall saying that I gave a shit about flora or fauna. [/B]