quote: (post)

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
In that case, as Superman was mentioned (not by me, btw...):

If a thread specifies OWAW Superman, can Abhi take the highest highs of 'normal' Superman, and exponentially draw the line? After all, by logic and common sense, if 'normal' Superman can do XYZ, then OWAW Supes should be capable of the same to the nth degree.

So imagine abhi gleefully rubbing his hands, and scan dumping normal Supes and his resistance to magic/telepathy/Kryptonite. The highest ever speed feats and strength feats, and then claiming that OWAW has that and more.

DoS Doomsday took an energy blast that tore a hole in reality. H/P Doomsday, therefore, can tank....I dunno, whatever it is but incredibly amped, lol.

Kuurth has, on paper, both the enchantments of Cyttorrak AND the Serpent. Am I allowed to take Juggy's highest showings, apply it to him?

Sodom Yat, has, on paper (lol), Kryptonian level physicals AND a GL ring AND the Ion entity. Shall I stack them up on each other, or am I restricted to what was actually shown on panel by the character?

Beast is another good example. On paper, he has had several upgrades. So shall I take his highest showings back when he was human/ape level, and draw a line upwards? Or am I forced to actually use what is depicted?

Writers and artists don't care for these battleboards, lol. They don't care that back in 1994, character XYZ performed such and such a feat, so they should be able to do that same feat but better.

We care. and we have the distinctions, however. And if a thread specifies WBH, then it should be WBH. Not using Savage feats, especially if it is contradicted by WWH feats, say.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by carver9
So if I made a thread of OWAW Superman vs Jean Grey and said Jean wins easy 10/10 via telepathy, how would you counter it? Superman during OWAW didn't encounter any telepathy during the story, so how would you counter my argument?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by psycho gundam
Green scar is WBH holding himself back to the point that his walking around strength (base) is what enraged versions of Savage/Bannerless Hulk showed. All of his abilities are amplified including healing and of course TP resistance due to rage

quote: (post)

Originally posted by carver9
So if I made a thread of OWAW Superman vs Jean Grey and said Jean wins easy 10/10 via telepathy, how would you counter it? Superman during OWAW didn't encounter any telepathy during the story, so how would you counter my argument?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Lol, we've been talking often about you, dmills. Welcome back.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I would use normal Superman being resistant to it, and claim OWAW is 10,000 times more resistant /faster and will just stand there and laugh.

You will then counter with a scan of a sun dipped (not as long as OWAW) Superman struggling against telepathy (so, stronger than normal Superman, but weaker than OWAW. Pretend such a scan exists).

What should I do then?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
WHAT DID I TELL YOU ABOUT INCLUDING SUPERMAN IN YOUR WAR?!!!!!!

I'LL BREAK YOU, GAMMITE!!!!

quote: (post)

Originally posted by krisblaze
Let's do the BZ.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by krisblaze
Okay, I guess its not happening then.

Just as well I suppose. I have no clue how to get my hands on comics with all the torrent sites down.

I think Nova wins, I'll make my case when I get home from work.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by carver9
Was OWAW Superman stronger or did he just stop holding back per KMC? And you'll use scans outside of OWAW to aid in an argument for Superman? Why? I thought you separate the story from other Superman titles?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I would do it, to show how illogical your position is.

Glad you can see the irony.

Also, answer the q. Would you allow me to use scans of a weaker character to support an argument for the strongest ever character, when it is directly contradicted by the second strongest level of said character?

IOW, using level 3 to argue for level 1, when level 2 has opposrie showings