Just because its a forum fight does not mean you strip powers they are proven to have. And you certainly don't give them abilities they are NOT proven to have.
your logic is "X doesn't have impressive battle feats Y does. Therefore Y will beat X".
That's the reasoning you're using. Selectively at that.
You only say they're faulty because they prove you wrong.
I'm not twisting what you say I'm pointing out what you're saying even if you don't realize it.
Yuga doesn't have impressive battle feats, therefore he loses. Right?
TOAA doesn't have impressive battle feats, therefore he doesn't lose? Talk about hypocritical.
TOAA is TOAA while Yuga is a guy who can be killed by Darkseid like power. Big difference and trying to compare the two is beyond wrong. Quit ignoring that little fun fact I keep posting over and over again thats right in the comic.
Show me a statement where someone claims they can defeat TOAA or that someone of Darkseid power can do so.
Regardless of his conclusion(Odin and thanos could take Yuga Khan) being correct or incorrect his reasoning(because he lacks impressive battle feats) is horribly flawed.
You'll note that I've said nothing of his conclusion, just the reasoning.
"The sky is blue because ice cream is made from granite pebbles."
You'll note that the conclusion "The sky reflects a wavelength of light that is perceived and recognized by homo sapiens as 'blue' " is correct.
You'll not that the reasoning "Because a frozen dairy substance that is liquid at room temperature is generally composed of feldspar, mica and quartz." is incorrect.
I'm not arguing against his conclusion. I'm arguing against his flawed reasoning.
And its the only part I'm currently arguing against.
You totally missed how I was arguing against flawed reasoning. You'll note that my continued argument against flawed reasoning continues. I'm being consistant not hypocritical.
Toaa/God are literally manipulating everything that takes place in the Marvel Universe,
here we see them discussing the future arcs for the Silver Surfer and Black Panther:
Toaa/God is what makes characters in Marvel a reality,
doesn't seem logical that Toaa/God need to prove themselves
to their drawings with battle feats.
Especially when it's them that are creating said battles scenarios with a stroke of a pencil:
Gender: Male Location: Hiding from The Doctor, shhhh.....
No. Because Quan's reasoning is facetious and hypocritical.
Especially because the Darkseid can kill Yuga arguement isn't just based on power. It's prophecy. the son cannot kill the father is the only part preventing DS from acting.
and the rest of his arguement is horseshit. Trying to downplay Yuga's power by claiming that DS can kill him is assuming that Darkseid is weaker than Thanos and ignoring the context. Not to mention it's a high feat for Darkseid and a testament to his power, rather than a black mark against Yuga.
Or do I have to bring up what happened when Yuga woke up from the Source wall? He devoured a solar system after he nuked a few planets in the blink of an eye.
__________________ Wanted: New sig. Something crazy, zany, and slightly evil. Will give sig credit to whoever's I sport.
DS said to Orion, "I cannot kill Yuga Khan for the same reason you cannot kill me". Never once did DS demonstrate power on as grand a scale as Yuga, on panel [ie. killing most of the New Gods simultaneously, and merging with the source on a whim] - but if Darky's one comment makes him more powerful than Yuga, then I lulz @ this thread.
No... the context is necessary because the two parts of the argument are dependant on eachother. Ignoring one makes the other an inconclusive or bad argument.
KMC Community Forums
May 5th, 2008 05:09 PM
