If I had comicbooks older than my grandparents in my house, I'd love to get them. But I don't, so. As for details, it's Spider-Man fighting the X-Man. He also was at a major disadvantage at the time given the concussion.
We've seen live action Spider-Man lift pieces buildings.
Except for the fact that Spider-Man not only knows what Star Wars is, and hates it btw, has seen and combated every single ability Maul has access to. The fact that it comes from "the Force" doesn't make the ability itself somehow different or more powerful than if it came from a mutant.
Because reasons? Marvel is full of combatants, with these things called "swords" that outstripe Maul in every way, and Spider-Man is faster than speeding cars. You're acting like because Maul has a lightsaber, it's somehow more deadly to Spider-Man than say a steel sword that would also kill him just as easily. The point is to not get hit period, and Spider-Man is perfectly capable of that being faster, stronger, and more agile than Maul.
It's almost like gravity exists and it was resting on his neck? It's almost like Maul can't pin Spider-Man down because nothing he can do with the Force is remotely comparable. Almost.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
This isn't how debating works. You don't ignore 99 percent of Maul's showings and falsely assume he easily chokes Spider-Man out whose faced stronger, vastly more powerful opponents than Maul just because you really want Maul to win. The force isn't any more special or harder to combat than any other ability. We've seen the order 66 utterly crush the Jedi order with non force users save Vader. They were crushed so badly the few who remained went into hiding. We've also seen far weaker opponents get the better of force users such as Cad Bane defeating Kenobi in hand to hand combat.
All jokes aside, your avatar, sig, title and location are depressing. You're such a no life that you have 120k posts here all considered as trolling by everyone else in this forum and just in the last couple of weeks, you've spent hours every day trying to annoy people in SW forums just because your favorite ST character lost to Palpatine in another thread. I've seen some retarded things here but your butthurt probably stands alone
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
I have been here for eight years and am highly actively when I'm online. It's always amusing to hear another nerd say you're a bigger nerd than I am. I'm currently into Star Trek and Star Wars so I debate those topics. I'm a loud poster and I don't ever back down so that tends to people the wrong way. Who cares ? I alwYs will exp,ain't my reasoning and give evidence to back my case whether you agree or not.
I am not butthurt I want to debate the topic. I fight bias at every turn but unlike my opposition I don't tire, show weakness, or stop. I'm one in a trillion.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
So having fun with a sig for my one on one debate says I'm biased. Nah. Darth Ant did the same thing. I guess passion to you means bias. I debate the same way across the board. Bias is when your debating principles change from thread to thread or relying on an outlier feat and demanding people prove you wrong. I argue in character based off evidence in every thread.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
Trash talking is what I do. I won't ever stop but that doesn't make me biased as I have already explained. Try to sit back and have more fun. You sound extremely bitter.
Your trolling(or whatever you wanna call it) isn't funny though. So I can't really have fun watching you f with people and you ignore context so seriously debating you is pointless as well.
Either get more entertaining or make more sense so our interactions can have some sort of function.
Well for starters, Maul is nowhere near comparable to Vader. Second, yes. Fact is, Spider-Man, and many a comic book hero, are well beyond the scope of Star Wars. I already said this.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
I never ignore the context of any scenes. I get it you don't like me but such is life. Whenever you go there's some dirtbag you can't stand. Deal with it and maybe try to prove me wrong. The point of this site is to debate not to say I can't stand this guy I'll ignore him.
Then its too late to save you, brobeans.
I don't think I've ever had nor will have a problem with anyone on KMC so I don't have a problem with you either.
Someone like Palpatine or Yoda is clearly meant to be well above gunslingers. Top SW characters' EU portrayals are almost godlike and even in the movies they're clearly well above anyone with no legit superpowers. You're arguing against this which I find to be pointless.
Ngl, you're pretty good at standing your ground in debates but any sane person can see why a top tier force user can defeat a person who relies on guns and fists. Its like debating with someone who thinks a Clint Eastwood character could defeat Sauron from LOTR. Why would I waste my time with something like that?
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Can you just **** off Quan?
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
No, you can't make blanketed statements like that and expect that to pass go. The skill of every combatant matters not some vague baseless claim that they are beyond gunslingers. Jango Fett doesn't have superpowers nor does Pre Vizlsa or Cad Bane. Some of them killed and beat jedi. Jango was a legit challenge to Windu who took down the dark master of the Sith. If they aren't even beyond guys with no powers from their own universe how do you expect that generalized statement to apply to other fictional characters.
I tend to look at how characters are portrayed against other highly skilled characters who are armed with their best. If Yoda was beyond the clones he wouldn't bring Kenobi to the temple when they weren't in higher numbers. It's clearly an issue. Yoda also needed help from the clones in the first episode of the clone wars from the clones who said he wouldn't see that coming despite Yoda's precognition, etc.
The final nail in the coffin is when a larger group of droids were porrayed as greater than a decently sized group of Jedi including most of the best save Yoda. Dooku sat back and knew they'd be overwhelmed and we've seen even Jar Jar Binks stumble into a battlefield and take droids out who are awful.
This is evidence that supports my viewpoints not just a generalized baseless statement not founded on really anything.
Nov 26th, 2015 02:05 PM
