The godblast wasn't amped, Mjolnir's durability was amped. Thor even says so in that comic. It was a shared blast I agree, but it broke Oblivion's spell upon them. Oblivion hinted that he had played the 3 Abstracts for puppets at the end of the comic, so that's a stupendous feat for the GB, shared feat or not.
I was talking specifically about its feats from the post-crisis era, not whether the Crisis affected the New Gods universe or not.
Actually the God Blast was not amped, it was the hammer which was reinforced. And yes, the hammer has never shattered on another occasion, which is why it's considered to be far and away the most powerful God Blast seen so far.
Which makes sense, the blast was so intense it actually stunned Exitar and broke his internal dome casting which was more durable then his outside armor. And this was when Celestials were at the height of their power.
I think Godkiller meant that the God Blast shook the three free from Oblivion's negative influence.
Thor clearly stated that he tied it up in the belt of strength to reinforce it against the massive energies produced from the GB. There is absolutely no indication whatsoever that the blast itself was amped in any form at all.
More or less that. Considering Oblivion's place in the cosmic hierarchy, how the Chaos King turned out to be a mere infinitesimal aspect of him, and how Oblivion embodies the very concept behind the Ultimate Nullifier's offensive capabilities, I'd say it's a big feat.
How does that even works? BOS amps thor, not an inanimate object like mjolnir.
It was a shared feat and it didn't do much than catching their attention since someone was attacking them. Was it ever explained that it broke any spell over them?
What kind of silly question is that? How do you expect anyone to even answer that with a straight face? The writer most likely has no idea how the belt of strength works, much less us.
Mjolnir was reinforced by the belt of strength. Trying to get into anymore in-depth analysis will just end up people yelling magic at you.
Ask DeFalco how that works. Although my money would be on the fact that since it augments Thor's physical strength when it's wielded by him, it was hence reasoned by Thor that it would similarly strengthen Mjolnir as well.
Look over what the phrase "under someone's spell" means. I am talking about Oblivion's manipulation of the Abstracts when I use the term spell. Why would any explanation be given, when we are shown that the 3 of them are no longer acting buck crazy after being hit by the GB, and Oblivion himself tells us that is expectation of the fight to continue doesn't happen?
I'm at work right now (Yes, I'm that bored), I'll post the scans when I get home. I can guarantee you that Thor said he was reinforcing Mjolnir however.
Considering it was DeFalco, I doubt that he doesn't know how BOS works.
Ok.
Oblivion didn't have them under control anywhere. He was manipulating the fight from behind the scenes.
Because there was no indication that the abstracts were in his control to begin with? Manipulation=/=controlling. Also I find it hilarious that Scrier was an abstract without any explanation when before he was somewhere in Thanos class going by SS v3.
Everyone knows how the belt of strength works on Thor, it doubles his strength. But you asked an explaniation as to how it would reinforce the hammer, that's a dumb question tbh. It's magic, that's the best answer you'll get.
It's available on the respect thread. If abhi has doubts about the validity of our claims, he can verify it himself by checking out the respect thread. Especially considering that this particular idea of the GB being amped when it stunned Exitar has been debunked to death in previous arguments as well.
That was a dead mephisto who was a shadow of his prime and Scrier took him by surprise.
No its not. I checked it. If you found the scan, please post it.
He had them under some kind of cosmic mind control spell. Or do you think that the 3 Abstracts just randomly went crazy and started destroying the multiverse?
Mephisto wasn't on his deathbed. He straight up crushed the devil. His most recent portrayal solidified his place as a peer of Galactus-level abstracts in the cosmic hierarchy. Trying to dispute such a basic fact is pointless.
What? It's present on literally the very first page of the thread:
I'm not dismissing Scrier's recent feats. I'm just amused how Scrier went from needing to add his power to Agatha Harkness to take down a dead mephisto from behind to destroying multiverse and shit.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 12th, 2013 06:05 PM
