The Last King of Scotland Review
by Mark R. Leeper (mleeper AT optonline DOT net)November 14th, 2006
THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND
(a film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: Based on a novel but inspired by real events, this is the story of a young Scottish doctor who
becomes a personal confidant of Idi Amin, one of the most bloodthirsty tyrants in African history. The
history of Idi Amin is an intriguing story, but this film tells us too much about its fictional European and not enough about the politics of Uganda under an all-too-real tyrant. Forest Whitaker gives a superb performance as a dictator of many faces, often
changing from one to another in seconds. But we need to see more of what Amin did. Rating: +2 (-4 to +4) or 7/10
Besides one or two rarely seen documentaries and docu-dramas, cinema has paid little attention to the rule of Idi Amin (or Idi Amin Dada) of Uganda from 1971 it 1979. Amin, formerly a member of the British King's African Rifles and also formerly a champion prizefighter, made an international spectacle of himself with his truly weird behavior, including jokes that he was a cannibal, as well as his inhuman tactics as a dictator. We see an important and ruthless leader through the eyes of a European who is at least inspired by a real person. That approach was used with SHOGUN also, but SHOGUN was long enough that it allowed us to see a good chunk of Japanese history. Nicholas Garrigan has other things on his mind when Amin is doing his worst.
James McAvoy plays Nicholas Garrigan, a young Scottish doctor who decides to leave home in order to escape from his overbearing father. He chooses Uganda by chance and decides to use his talent to help out at a rural clinic. This is in an area where four out of five people still prefer the services of a witch doctor to a medical one. Garrigan arrives just after a military coup. Garrigan is caught up in the excitement of change to the then popular leader Amin, and it is not long before Garrigan actually meets the now-President Idi Amin (played by Forest Whitaker).
Garrigan is offered a Faustian bargain. Amin has a volatile personality, but he does have a predilection for the Scottish and on an impulse--how Amin seems to make most of his decisions--he asks Garrigan to be his personal physician. It is an offer that the young doctor is not actually permitted to refuse. Garrigan takes the position and becomes what Amin calls his closest advisor. He finds that Amin has his own charm, at times almost a childlike quality. But being a close advisor makes Garrigan a pawn caught between the sinister forces of the Ugandan
dictatorial regime and what may be equally sinister, the forces of the British government. Simon McBurney has a nicely ambiguous role as British diplomatic agent Nigel Stone. Garrigan finds himself figuratively riding a tiger that he dare not dismount.
The presence of the British in Uganda very much hangs over this film. Amin himself worked his way up the ranks in the British military and it was the British who helped to install Amin in power. Still, Amin hates the British because of his ill treatment by them, yet he loves the Scottish whom he does not think of as British. And when Amin decides to expel foreigners, it is the Asians he wants removed and notably not the British.
There are some dissatisfying aspects of the script. Garrigan is kept in the Kampala palace, isolated from and largely ignorant of the reign of terror that Amin is inflicting on Uganda. That means that much of what would be of interest is simply not possible to shown in this story from Garrigan's point of view. Garrigan is in a state of denial about the rumors that he hears that things are getting very bad in the country. He continues to admire and have affection for the initially populist Amin while unbeknownst to him a bloodbath is going on mostly outside Kampala. A more interesting story might have had Idi Amin as the central character or perhaps the intriguing Nigel Stone, who much more than the Scot has a global view of Ugandan politics. Frankly, Garrigan's sexual adventures usually are a mere distraction from the most compelling aspects of the story. Garrigan is the third most interesting person in a film in which he is supposedly the main character, and that is exactly how McAvoy plays him.
Be warned that there are some harrowing scenes in this film. But a more complete picture of Amin's reign would have been much more harrowing. After very fine films about African politics like HOTEL RWANDA and the even more riveting SOMETIMES IN APRIL, THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND is merely a good film among great ones. As such I give it a +2 on the -4 to +4 scale or 7/10.
Mark R. Leeper
[email protected]
Copyright 2006 Mark R. Leeper
More on 'The Last King of Scotland'...
Originally posted in the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup. Copyright belongs to original author unless otherwise stated. We take no responsibilities nor do we endorse the contents of this review.
