Deconstructing Harry Review
by "Nathaniel R. Atcheson" (nate AT pyramid DOT net)January 5th, 1998
Deconstructing Harry (1997)
Director: Woody Allen
Cast: Woody Allen, Billy Crystal, Demi Moore, Robin Williams, Judy Davis, Elisabeth Shue, kirstie Alley, Bob
Balaban, Richard Benjamin, Eric Bogosian, Hazelle Goodman, Mariel Hemingway, Amy Irving, Julie Kavner,
Caroline Aaron, Eric Lloyd, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Tobey Maguire, Stanley Tucci
Rated R: Language, sex, nudity
by Nathaniel R. Atcheson ([email protected])
I don't know a single person that doesn't think that Woody Allen is annoying. I, myself, am one of those
people. I think he is intensely annoying. I watch him jitter and shake around the screen, spewing
half-sentences like a broken verbal machine gun, with those black little eyes magnified behind those
ridiculously thick glasses, and I wonder why I repeatedly go to see the films that he writes, directs, and
stars in. It doesn't take me long to figure it out--he's really funny. That's usually what it comes down to.
Maybe the character he plays isn't always really funny, but his supporting characters are so funny, and the
situations are absolutely hilarious.
Deconstructing Harry is his latest film, and I imagine that to obtain complete enjoyment, one should know
Woody Allen pretty well. I, for one, do not--I have not seen a lot of his films (I think this marks the fourth
or fifth), and what I know of him outside of his work is just what I read in the tabloids and Entertainment
Weekly. But I know that this film is one big stab at himself, and I can assume that it is successful. But like
most of his films, this one is successful because of the numerous interesting characters, and the witty,
sharp, Woody Allen humor. What this film seems to have that his others do not is a jagged edge, a kind of
licentious and hateful quality, an element present simply to make more fun of himself.
It's about Harry Block (Allen), a godless, sex-crazed author who, at the time of the film, is in complete
disarray. He's just written a book that gives up the secrets of some of his closest friends and ex-girlfriends,
and none of them are particularly happy with the situation. He's never allowed to see his kid, his parents
have all but disowned him, his sister and her husband look down upon him because he isn't a true Jewish
man, and so forth. On top of all this, he can't get motivated to write anything significant, so his life is on
hold.
The film is kind of a journey for Harry to understand himself, or maybe make himself better, should he
reach the point of caring about himself. It leads to a situation in which he's driving in a Volvo with a
hooker and a corpse, on his way to get honored by the school which expelled him. Like all of Allen's
films, he has a huge cast. It's nearly distractingly large, with almost every part filled up by a big-name star.
Most of the women turn in the best performances, with genuinely funny moments delivered by Judy Davis,
Kirstie Alley, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, and Demi Moore. If you're familiar with Allen's films, then you'll know
what to expect--it's the same kind of humor, pacing, and mood to which we're all accustomed in his
movies.
This one, however, seems to suffer from a peculiar storytelling technique. Because of the nature of the
story, Harry frequently relives pieces of short stories that he has written; most of them star a guy thinly
disguised as himself, and tells a true story. He remembers one of the first stories he wrote, about his first
encounter with a prostitute. Another story he remembers is one in which he goes to hell to save the woman
he loves. Throughout the film, the action also switches to a different cast doing the exact same thing,
which is meant to represent the book which he has just written (the one that everyone is upset at him for).
If my explanation of this is confusing, then I'm doing my job--it is also rather confusing in the film. I didn't
put the pieces together until the last quarter of the movie. It's really not that obvious, nor is Allen's reason
for doing it (though I imagine if you're familiar with all of his work then there is something here to give you
a hint). The flashbacks sure are funny, though.
Towards the end, he actually meets the character that he created, his alter-ego, and this individual gives
Harry all kinds of advice. I like the idea (look into your writing for advice), and the central idea behind his
character--he can function in the artistic world but not in the realistic world--is a fascinating one.
Ultimately, the film aside from the comedy works because Allen really thought about his concepts and
materialized them effectively (although the flashbacks to his stories could have been less confusing).
Whether you love him or hate him, you're likely to enjoy Deconstructing Harry. And if you know Allen
really well, you'll probably get a lot more out of the film. As for me, it proved to make a worthwhile
evening of entertainment, even if though is about a godless, sex-crazed author in complete disarray.
>From 0-10: 7
Grade: B-
************/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\************
Visit FILM PSYCHOSIS at
http://www.pyramid.net/natesmovies
Nathaniel R. Atcheson
************/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\************
More on 'Deconstructing Harry'...
Originally posted in the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup. Copyright belongs to original author unless otherwise stated. We take no responsibilities nor do we endorse the contents of this review.
