just something short about organics VS webshooters
organics are much better because if he can do what ever a spider can in the comics, why does he need artificial weebing insted of having it in the genes. so he isnt SPIDER-man a SPIDER has WEB if he doesnt have web and has to create it. thats just dumb because he isnt SPIDER-man then. the movie is better in terms of the way the web is done
i agree cos being organic the manipulation of the webing (like web dome, web impact, web nets, strong,fick) are more "realistic" since, i always questioned my self how he manage to make so many types of webbing only by "difference in nuance of his hand moviment" thats is a crap argument. just says he do and ok.
now the organic being part of him we can even say he does it mentally or whatever like it.
not to say about the bump that should be out of his sleeve
BLAH BLAHB BLAH. Be ready, get ur torch and ropes people...........i can hear the man-spider clan aproaching!
Gender: Male Location: Behind you with a rusty steak knife
ya verily.
i agree, but spiders don't go swinging around by their butts, where the webs come out. i remember drawing pictures of spiderman swinging around by his @$$ when i was in kindergarten.
so if sonys movie franchise rapes to death the character of spider-man and turns him into a damn man-spider monster like they did and dumbs down his character taking away his greatest scientific invention like they did,you all could care less? how truely sad.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Aug 9th, 2004 at 09:27 PM
no one said that!
the ugly sony movie is as much unloyal to peter parker spiderman as the 90 series get over it. they cant reproduce what have been told twice like in the 60s and 90 s right?.
the webshooter in the 90 cartoon went inside peter body and was way too advanced to what the poor parker could aford with his salary.
the only true character spiderman adaption was the 60s animation so get over it.
the second movie totally salvaged the organics. i also had a problem "adapting" to them in the first movie, because the conflict of running out of web fluid has been eliminated and that is one fun factor in the story line. the only qualms i have about it is how he doesn't make any quips while he's fighting.
While I agree that the running out of web fluid always made for an interesting foible in the comics, it seems to me that no kid, no matter how smart, can develop something that the U.S. military has been attempting to recreate for several years now (and by that I mean a synthetic spider silk). I know the kid is pretty bright, but a revolutionary inventor who just happens to get bitten by a radioactive spider? Come on now
Organic webs make at least a little more sense than that.
Oh and by the way....the web shooters in the 90's cartoon weren't implanted into his forearms man. . . they were mechanical and removeable, like in the comics.
__________________ 'Alright, I'll bite. How'd you get the fish bowl stuck on your head?'
Last edited by stubby2903 on Aug 10th, 2004 at 02:25 AM
I wonder how a spiderbite can tell him how to make webs?
and I think the sony movie actually is helping spiderman. in all honestly, only you "true spiderfans(aka biggest whinners in the universe) really give a rat's A$$ (or peter parkers @$$) about this watering down the character. organics dont make him any less know, or worse off, i mean what kid who never read the comics b4 after seeing the movie goes and says"without the webshooters spiderman is terrible" it doesnt matter, all they see is a cool superhero who swings on webs. if anything, the uber awsomeness of the movies will get kids interested in the comics, and they might just pick up a issue of amazing or ultimate spiderman.
Yeah anybody whoever watched the 90's toon knows that the webshooters in that cartoon were mechical and he had the chemical fluid from the comics that he stored in the webshooters.
and please stubby,dont bring that old lame a$$ argument for the organics into the picture that no kid no matter how smart,can develop something that the u.s. military has been attempting to create and hasnt,that argument is so laughable because you are implying that a kid creating a cheimical fluid is not believeable but a kid gaining the powers of a spider from a spiderbite is.give me a freaking break,the whole thing of spider-man is unbelievable and if anything,gaining the powers of a spider to scale walls ect from a spiderbite is more unbelievable than a kid creating a fluid that the military cant,so again,dont bring that laughable defense for the organics into this discussion again because it does not hold up under scrutiny.
the organic webbing doesnt make him less spiderman.
what i think sony mistaked was to make peter parker a gerk, i mean geek instead of nerd ( well they showed it a bit in the "raindrop scene")
and as spiderman peter parker is more confident in himself, what he didnt show in both movies, also spiderman voice under the mask should be like, the angry voice he does in the final octopus battle ,like when he says: - YouŽre gonna hurt lot more people now. and then - But iŽm NOT!
this should be he full time spiderman voice.
this was actually what i most hated in first movie ,like when spidey puts mj in top of a rooftop witha church behind them, i mean comon he have the same voice its impossible how no one notices it (especially her whoŽd met him twice) or 3 times.
i like his voice when he says : Where is she? - thats is a example of how he voice as spiderman should be. i also dislike the magic wand suit. it just came from nowhere(they state he made it on the second movie) but he doesnt have the money to afford it. and plus, he lost the suit on first movie but "repairred " it in the end, again in the second same thing, i just hope that spiderman -sins of the father as will be the subtitle doesnt end with spiderman happilly swing in town again.
iŽd rather see his dark tone, like him in shadows in the rain near one gargules, lamenting the death of his friend and saying thats his curse
about mj they made her mre like mj, like when he grabs a wood stick, and tryes to sneak on octopus, with this scene they showed the strong side of mj, and when in the end she joins peter.but to hell mj, she was suposed to be the sweeter gorgeous girl, i dont like dusnt, i want gwen!! and so on let spiderman cheat mj on third movie with miss brant.
WOHHIA!! did u realise she says: if u wanna socialise ask me for a date on sm 2 game?
I say it once, I sayit twice. "sony's spiderman is actually helping"
the more people who see the film, the more likely one of them is going to go and pick upa copy of amazing or ultimate spiderman. then they can find out about webshooters, and if they actually have a thought concerning the web shooters and organics, they can decide which 1 they like.
ok idiot i wont go down to your level but what my chickeny freind says is right no one gives a rats @$$ wether or not about thew godamn freaking web shooters asl ogn as he can shoot ebs is all i care about but still you make a point rj and am i crazy yes dont blame me blame the sugar high mwhaahahahahahahhahahah *super rock 36 i need scissors*%
Just thinking out loud here... but if the web is organic does that mean that Peter has grown extra organs in order to produce the webbing? If so how is he going to explain that if he should ever end up in the hospital (like he did in Spiderman 2). Isn't a doctor going to notice the bulge in his wrist when he tries to take blood pressure/pulse or such things. How about when he has x-ray or ultrasound, would they not notice the whole extra organ.... Just wondering
I think that the organic webs cause more problems than web shooters but I don't mind that as long as they are not using the whole organic web as an easy way out and ignore all the problems it will cause Peter.
Does anyone remember if Peters shirt was rolled up when he was visiting the doctor or not...
KMC Community Forums
Aug 9th, 2004 04:40 PM
