And how many years did it take to get the sequel. Therein lies the answer. Ridley Scott has diarrhea of the mouth. You are free to get worked up over this dolts ramblings but unlike you I'm capable of learning from past experiences.
I wouldn't let him near it. I'd let Villeneuve take a crack at it again, but only if they get a new writer onboard. Someone who can write a less slow plot.
I tend to agree. The opening with Dave Bautista was really cool and then I actually sort of felt like it was all down hill from there. I had trouble caring because it was soooooo slow moving. Although the cinematography was phenomenal all the way through.
saw this last night and liked it. i knew this would be a slow movie and i wasn't expecting a thrill ride. it was really slow but the cinematography was beautiful, bought it on blu ray
i still liked ghost in the shell better though
Dave Bautista was great, much better actor than the rock
Yeah, Dave has shown that he can actually deliver a pretty solid performance if given the right part. Sadly, because of his appearance, he tends to get typecast as some kind of big brute/thug a lot (which is very apparent if you look at his filmography).
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Yeah, and I'm usually okay with that, especially when the cinematography and visuals are soooo good, but the characters were so distant and un-relatable that I couldn't really get into it.
And it didn't feel like there was ever really a decent pay-off.
That being said, I do plan to watch it again and give it another chance.
__________________
Last edited by Patient_Leech on Jan 22nd, 2018 at 06:49 PM
KMC Community Forums
Jan 9th, 2018 01:52 AM
