see this poster for the most part can spot good acting.She ALSO realises Moore and connery were much better.I disagree with her though on putting Dalton behind the horrible acting of Brosnan though obviously.Dalton was better and should have stayed on if they wanted to continue the Bond series and Craig is easily much better than Brosnan as well.I put him ahead of Dalton also.
those same people are allso the same people that are ignorant enough though to allow hollywood to brainwash them and cant think for themselves though. they have been so brainwashed by hollywood that they are incapable of thinking for themselves.fact.can either aceept it or live in denial on it.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Dec 16th, 2006 at 09:14 PM
Connery certainly played the best Bond, likewise Brosnan looked most like the part. However looks can only take you so far without the personality to back you up. In terms of being Bond, Brosnan fell short by a considerable amount. My personal favourite is Connery, followed very closely by Moore.
wow, a conspiracy theory... how the mighty have fallen... well, thats assuming you were mighty in the first place, which you weren't...
i think brosnan was a fine bond personally, i thought goldeneye was one of the best ever bond movies... he brought something to the role that hadnt been there before imo...
you my friend got logic and common sense. Yeah Brosnan was just being Brosnan in the Bond movies.He has been good in some other movies but he failed miserably in his portrayal of Bond.Like i said earlier,they should have stuck with Dalton since they insisted on continuing the series.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Dec 19th, 2006 at 11:01 PM
Sorry but what excactly do you find bad in brosnan?????ok..you say that he plays the same as he was playing in remington steele..right??ok..Remington steele was a VERY-VERY succesful tv series with a LOT-LOT of fans!also...james bond is not like YOU imagine him(like Jude Law,with trendy clothes or something:P---this could be disgusting for a bond movie)..is like ian fleming imagined him!With CLASSIC STYLE(even old fashioned), WITH HUMOR,AND CHARMING!.....Pierce brosnan has ALL tose qualifications!and there are million of people out there to confirm what i am saying!!Sorry!And of course he passed his lines because these "lines" happened to be very similar to IAN FLEMING S JAMES BOND!....If those lines was not similar to Bond lines then the producers would have fired him...so..try to think like a bond fun!not like Spider-Man fun!James bond is not a trendy muscular freak like those you see in comics! :P
Yeah, Pierce Brosnan wasn't very suitable for this role. It was really wierd to see him on the screen as Bond. He is a good actor ,but he doesn't have that kind of quality.
Personally, I think Roger Moore was the best James Bond. He's humorous and polite.More like a gentleman than a spy. Connery was a more classical Bond.
__________________
Friendship is the finest balm for the pangs of disappointed love.
No Dalton wasn't good,and also Craig is not good(NOT GOOD AT ALL!!!)As about Moore...i DON'T like him..i don't....!!..it isn't nice to see people who look so "cold",(not cool!!),to play bond!Pierce brosnan was very qualified actor and very handsome guy(much more hansome and charming than Moore and Dalton )so he was very nice as bond!ALSO BOND IS A SPY!IS NOT JUST A GENTLE MAN!!SO...he must do some ACTION!!not to walk like a 60 year old man or to talk-talk all the the time and telling jokes(like Moore did)..!!Also to be a playboy like pierce brosnan looks like!!NOW WHAT THE F.... PLAYBOY COULD DANIEL CRAIG BE!?????IT SEEMS FAKE!!