I saw a rare piece of outstanding journalism last night with a documentary on the UK's Channel 4 that demolished the official story of global warming with scientists who exposed the lies peddled by the scientific establishment and the intimidation of those who refuse to support the official line.
As I said in my newsletter two weeks ago, global warming is caused by changes going on with the SUN. The claims about carbon dioxide are part of a gigantic fraud to impose more taxaxtion and control.
VIDEO OF THE UK CHANNEL 4 DEMOLITION OF THE CARBON DIOXIDE-CAUSES-GLOBAL WARMING HOAX.
Guardian Environment Correspondent Condemns The Great Global Warming Swindle Documentary But Then Says He Never Watched It!
{'For a man in his position not to have watched a demolition of the carbon-dioxide-causes-global-warming lie that he perpetuates every day is a disgrace and shows that he and his like are not to be taken seriously. Here is a man far more interested in justifying his own existence than researching the truth.' }
'The [UK] Conservatives are planning a series of new environmental taxes on flights aimed at combating climate change. The party will publish a consultation document on Sunday asking people for their views on various proposals. The proposals include levying VAT or fuel duty on domestic flights and a green air miles scheme.'
I'm also an environmental socialist. Not one of those crack pots you see on American TV, one who is concerned about the poor and the environment. I always thought Global Warming was propoganda and not what people say it is...and now I have proof.
Haven't seen it myself but I really don't care what "experts" have to say about this sort of stuff. Pollution PERIOD is a problem. There's still air pollution, pollution in water, and so on that is killing people (doesn't have many stats on killing many besides Native Americans in their reservations though).
Global warming debates are like boxing: whoever gets the last lick wins, for the moment
Gender: Male Location: between apathy and indifference
The earth changes, that is a given. But if someone cannot accept that the overpopulation of the earth by about 4 billion people, the pollution resulting from the massive farming, industry and lifestyles of those people and the devastation of the environment and it's ability to cope with the pollution isn't hastening the process then they are a f*cking idiot.
As for global warming being a scam by those in power...George Bush (along with a few other of the world's politicians) says that it's not true, but he's supposed to be one of the illuminati's chubs who should tow the company line, so doesn't this really f*ck up some of your previous theories Deano?
__________________ "I made a typo bif deal" - JacopeX
Global Warming is a neo-marxism scandal for those who want to end capitalism. And yes, this population explosion is an environmental problem. George Bush is an environmental problem. The corrupt government are one bad side, the crazy environmentalistare another. Things like these make me glad I'm neutral.
No no no. I agree with nvironmental pollution and all that, but all this chaos and propoganda is by those who want to end capitalism. Just ask Patrick Moore, the co-founder of greenpeace. He's probably the best person to go to.
I don't think people want to "end" capitalism, but there is a lot of bullshit getting spewed from these big boy companies who could prevent pollution easily but it just cost a little more. They won't be at a deficit but the top guns don't want to let a few million out of their pockets as if it would really hurt them any.
Example: Risk assessments are just mathematical jargon that in PR terms can be paraphrased as the following: "Hmmm, how many people am I willing to harm before I stop this?"
That environmental protection isn't that big of a deal as it seems. Yes, I agree that we should look after it, but not to the point where we lose a million pounds to save a flower. Tony Blair for one was very eager to spread the use of wind power, but once he got in power, he saw that it was more beneficial to stick with coal and oil.
Gender: Male Location: between apathy and indifference
Try to think big picture here.
O.K., this should read, Tony Blair for one was very eager to spread the use of wind power, but once he got in power, he saw that it was more financially beneficial to stick with coal and oil.
__________________ "I made a typo bif deal" - JacopeX
The big picture is what? We wasted all that money for something people won't even notice?
Yes, Tony loves money, but he realised that saving the environment wasn't as important as he thought. Or he just used the environment as an excuse to get into power. I mean what do I know?
Im so glad that the global warming farce has finally started to become realized by the general public. I have been telling people this for the last five years, but have been viewed as "one of those" Now they are "one of those" i feel so damn good. It's even more mind boggeling however, how some people when faced with facts still believe that the planet has a tempeture that we caused
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
KMC Community Forums
Mar 11th, 2007 04:44 PM
