I am against carnage being in spider-man because it's PG-13 and he'd suck unless they make it R rated whih won't happen because Sony would lose money cause not so many peopele would be able to see it...some people seem to think he will be in it and that Carngae would work in a PG-13, so lets settle this in one thread rather than all the threads...should Carnage be in a future spider-man film?
It depends. If Sam Raimi can find some way to make Carnage less blood-thirsty, then he can be in the movie. Rather than killing people, Carnage could just be destructive and destroy buildings or something. I don't know...
Last edited by Black Yoshi on Jun 3rd, 2007 at 09:12 PM
This is 50/50 question. Sam Raimi must find some sort of way to keep a PG-13 rating as well as keep the Carnage fans happy. Sam Raimi is the right man for the job. He can certainly have Carnage on screen and keep the same Spiderman rating.
Yer but also he didn't get enough screen time, I wanted him to totally pwn Pete but there wasn't really alot of that. I liked he Venom scream, that was done well...he kinda sounded abit like a bird though...but the voice was all wrong,I agree with that
Look carnage is more violent that Ock, what Ock did in 2 would be nothing compared to what carnage does, Ock doesn't like to kill people where as Carnage e loves it and he does it in a way you could only have in a nightmare...carnage wouldn't work in a spider-man film...they'd probably mess his voice up as well
Maybe, maybe not. It really depends on who plays Carnage/Cletus Kasady. They could always imply that Carnage is killing and yet not show it kind of how the Mummy showed the pharoh and others being killed and yet it's not on the screen.
as much as I love to psychically explore the cosmos and think of myself as a baby hippopotamus