I didn't like the ending of HBP. I don't know what more they could have done with it because i think a proper funeral for Dumbledore would have been unnecessary but for such a mild story the ending felt anticlimactic. Maybe it was how Dumbledores death was handled because his death seems like it should have been more impactful. I really think they should have ended HBP by showing the beginning of Deathly Hollows.
I really can't think of anything else that i hated about the movies. I can't really complain about content from the books being left out because as far as film goes, it takes a lot of time to introduce and develop new characters as well as developing old ones. I have never been overly disappointed with the adaptations because the Directors and screen writers seem to know that the most important aspect of the Potter stories are the characters. I'm glad that dobby was left out but i do wish Creatures story had been explored a bit more.
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
WARNING SPOILER
***************************
*****************************
*******************************
***********************************
**************************************
***********************************
*******************************
*****************************
***************************
Man I hate that they cut so much out of the movie.
Like someone mentioned that in the half-blood prince the weasley's house gets burned down but in the next movie they have to have the wedding of Fleur and Bill and also they realized that they don't talk about the wedding at all during the movie.
[SPOILER - highlight to read]: Bill has never been introduced, or even mentioned (besides the one picture from their trip to Egypt in PoA), there will be NO wedding scene.
It's also in debate about that (I just discovered it)in The stuff about Movie 7 and Plus they either have the wedding or find the deathly Hallows sign somewhere(Lunas dad is at the wedding wearing it)
the fact that theyre about harry potter i hate the series tolkien spent a couple decades creating a world and some waitress comes and steals his thunder in a couple years wtf! and hp sucks i will welcome hate mail
__________________ This thing all things devours:
Birds, beasts, trees, flowers;
Gnaws iron, bites steel;
Grinds hard stones to meal;
Slays king ruins town,
And beats high mountain down.
okay can i rephrase my last send hp doesnt suck but i still have a resentment towards it
and yes halfe blood is PG ? its gonna be cheap goblet of fire was pg 13 (i think ) and it was unworthy of that title it really shouldve been plain PG
__________________ This thing all things devours:
Birds, beasts, trees, flowers;
Gnaws iron, bites steel;
Grinds hard stones to meal;
Slays king ruins town,
And beats high mountain down.
The films themselves. Suck balls. The only, and I mean only saving graces were the character's portrayed by Richard Harris, Alan Rickman, Tom Felton, and Evanna Lynch. Tme along with Harry's irreverance during the Liquid Luck scene. Everything else blew chunks.
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
Last edited by Lord Lucien on Aug 6th, 2009 at 11:15 PM
the ideas decent enough and the books were okayish (a little over done theyd kill/ meet something almost every chapter )
__________________ This thing all things devours:
Birds, beasts, trees, flowers;
Gnaws iron, bites steel;
Grinds hard stones to meal;
Slays king ruins town,
And beats high mountain down.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 19th, 2009 04:24 AM
