I like the interpretation part, but only if it's backed up by something.
__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
Apparently Cin is more 'technically' skilled because he was the battlemaster of the temple.
__________________ Every time this fool be come along
He gots you noobs cryin' out fo' mom
Leave the scene lookin' like Vietnam
Might as well call him "Matt Atom Bomb"
Like his name suggests, he's quite atomic
And this fool - he likes DC Comics
Two energy swords make up his symbol
And trust me, dawg, this homie's nimble
I hope that wasn't directed at me, I was merely summarising. Can't deny Kas'im was the best there though.
__________________ Every time this fool be come along
He gots you noobs cryin' out fo' mom
Leave the scene lookin' like Vietnam
Might as well call him "Matt Atom Bomb"
Like his name suggests, he's quite atomic
And this fool - he likes DC Comics
Two energy swords make up his symbol
And trust me, dawg, this homie's nimble
not directed at anyone really. whoever it was that said Drillag was more skilled than yoda. I will need proof. That he was battlemaster is not proof. that is all.
So, Wizards of the Coast entry in the Jedi Academy Miniatures, say that.
__________________ Every time this fool be come along
He gots you noobs cryin' out fo' mom
Leave the scene lookin' like Vietnam
Might as well call him "Matt Atom Bomb"
Like his name suggests, he's quite atomic
And this fool - he likes DC Comics
Two energy swords make up his symbol
And trust me, dawg, this homie's nimble
tell me mattatom, do you believe the wizards of the coast entry in the jediacademy miniatures? i don't know if i believe it to be canon or not. especially since it is contradicted by other sources.
__________________ Every time this fool be come along
He gots you noobs cryin' out fo' mom
Leave the scene lookin' like Vietnam
Might as well call him "Matt Atom Bomb"
Like his name suggests, he's quite atomic
And this fool - he likes DC Comics
Two energy swords make up his symbol
And trust me, dawg, this homie's nimble
and i thank you! i hope someone has a better source than that though. That's like saying the instruction manuel for my star wars stratego game is canon. And in it, it says that a 4 always beats a 5, and so on, so it could make our entire forum quite obsolete pretty quickly.
__________________ Every time this fool be come along
He gots you noobs cryin' out fo' mom
Leave the scene lookin' like Vietnam
Might as well call him "Matt Atom Bomb"
Like his name suggests, he's quite atomic
And this fool - he likes DC Comics
Two energy swords make up his symbol
And trust me, dawg, this homie's nimble
the anoon bondara is a direct contradiction. Since HE was the most skilled jedi in the order, drillag, the battlemaster, could NOT have been the most skilled.
Was Drallig battlemaster at the same point Anoon Bondara was alive?
__________________ Every time this fool be come along
He gots you noobs cryin' out fo' mom
Leave the scene lookin' like Vietnam
Might as well call him "Matt Atom Bomb"
Like his name suggests, he's quite atomic
And this fool - he likes DC Comics
Two energy swords make up his symbol
And trust me, dawg, this homie's nimble
Seriously Gideon, you're being ridiculous. Some of us actually want to debate and enjoy the forum. There is no reason we can't use logic to form arguments. It really doesn't matter what some obscure quote somewhere says if there are reasonable arguments against it.
__________________ http://darthglentract.tripod.com/index.html Go Jawa's!!
No, Glentract, you're being ridiculous. Seriously. Your definition of debate consists of "picking which 'obscure statements' we like and don't like." For example, I don't see you dropping that 'obscure statement' that Marka Ragnos was the most powerful of the ancient Sith anytime soon, despite the fact that there is nothing to corroborate it. If we dropped obscure statements entirely, then the likes of Ragnos, Nihilus, Sion, Revan, et al. would be eliminated from the discussion completely.
You want to debate? Apply the statements into a logical process and go from there. There is wiggle room, but that requires a cogent, well-articulated argument that is backed up by sources. That's where the debate comes from.
The days of cherrypicking ended with Lightsnake, just in case you missed the memo.
Nov 18th, 2009 04:13 AM
http://darthglentract.tripod.com/index.html Go Jawa's!!
