Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable
stupidest post i have ever read.
thor supes and cap are all about the same as being durable. Supes is prolly the most durable agaisnt blunt attack and thor and cap very close behind him.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Superman Vs Thor vs SS vs Marvel Who's more Durable
The only reason I even consider Superman to survive in the core of the Sun is because that is his power source. If it weren't then I would claim PIS to that too.
I change my mind SS can indeed survive in the core of the sun without it being PIS. This is because he can absorb sufficient energy to increase his durability (just like Superman).
Gender: Male Location: Ontario
but still reppin naija
I am now certain that h1a8 is doing this deliberately to irritate people. i honestly have never seen such a combination of so many unbelievably idiotic posts. My God........
__________________
All thanks goes to starlock.
"Beware trolls, know me and know fear"
I never ignored any one's post ever (not intentially anyway). I always have an argument against every member who presents evidence (unless I agree).
I claim PIS to certain things because they contradict the vast majority of a character's showings. For example, their is no way in hell Thor, BRB, Gladiator, etc. can hit with Supernova force. Them hitting with planetary force is acceptable but still iffy, but Supernova force? NO WAY! Yet all of them can knock the living hell out of SS with their slams and mightiest of blows. This contradicts SS surviving a Supernova at ground zero.
In this post I was nice and explained why is was PIS. Naturally, the burden is one those who don't believe it is PIS to prove it (by showing sufficient other evidence to support it). Just because it happened in comics doesn't mean it is valid.
What makes it valid is if it occurred sufficient enough times or can be logically deduced from something either well defined or something that has occur sufficient enough times.
How do you know they can knock around Surfer with their mightiest blows? And how does a 'IMO' answer equal it contradicting Surfer's history?
And how would we even know if they can do that anyway, since if they did, it'd be labeled PIS by you?
Editor's note: Nova the far weaker herald of Galactus can destroy a sun...
Ya, in this post you explained why it was pis, with the magical 'IMO' argument, but in every other post you didn't. Simply claimed it was pis... simply claimed EVERYTHING was pis.
The problem is, I said multiple high durability feats, and I could ramble on even more about them. You claimed every feat was pis, and said Surfer not amping himself couldn't take a planet destroying attack... Is this not trolling? Hell, you even said Surfer surviving in the core of a sun couldn't happen... after multiple times it happened...
That is correct. Just because Marvel wrote it, it doesn't make it valid...
You mean like the numerous high durability feats of Surfer that were called PIS?
This calls for an experiment. Let's see what happens.
Surfer survived a super nova uninjured.
Surfer has taken every Hulk attack to no effect (except when he was double depowered and Hulk cheapshotted him)
Surfer took Beta Ray Bill's full on hammer swings to no effect
Surfer flies through suns just because he can
Surfer took multiple attacks from Tenebrous and Aegis and was still awake, and then was exposed to the Crunch's energies.
Surfer took Korvac's cosmic bolt to no effect (which was said to be able to destroy a planet)
Surfer was able to fight inside a black hole
Surfer barely able to walk stayed awake for multiple pages of a pissed off WM beating on him
Surfer withstood a couple blows from a being that both Thanos and Galactus wanted it's power
etc
KMC Community Forums
Dec 25th, 2009 11:48 PM
