Registered: Mar 2014
Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Try and get this through your head. I mentioned above that these types of quotes were hyperbolic when given to more than one person, but do still show the recipient is one of the top Sith, and I intend to state that very clearly in my respect thread. I would also include such an accolade for Plagueis if I ever make a respect thread for him in the future and I would do such a thing for any other character I make a respect thread for.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
I don't quite see how this is a valid response to my post. I was civilly explaining my response to Bane's accolade and the fact that I'm not ignoring Plagueis's accolade, and you are just jumping off on various different tangents in an attempt to make me look like an ass.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
And why on Earth would I have to do that when it's pretty much the same accolade?
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
a) referring to a Sith who lived a vast amount of years after Bane. If we're accepting both, it simply means that both of them were the most powerful until they died, which then means that Plagueis surpassed Bane.
Even if not, then
b) Plagueis' accolade is newer, and newer canon always takes priority.
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
or...
c) both statements are slightly hyperbolic, but mark both of them as being among the very top dogs of the Sith.
and that one makes the most sense to me.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Because Sidious is most powerful confirmed by G-canon, any other Sith's accolades wouldn't override eachother because Sidious's come out on top no matter what, and because some of these accolades have absolute time statements (ie. ever/of all time) it wouldn't be by an "up to their time" standard. Slight hyperbole is the only way everything makes sense.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
quick thing guys - and pardon my ignorance, but didn't it say somewhere - I think it was lucas or an author, that palpatine couldn't beat plagueis in a lightsaber duel at the time he was his apprentice? so couldn't that mean that maybe palpatine's younger clone would be able to beat plagueis? and another thing since most people believe Bane can "stomp Vitiate who is now considered second only to sidious(or third to plagueis), and vitiate is considered to be able to defeat plagueis doesn't that mean that bane could defeat plagueis? considering so many believe Bane wins on sheer physical power? I honestly think Bane is SO overrated by his fanboys, awhile go some dumbass(on a long dead forum) said that bane would be able to beat Yoda AND sidious, which is completely and utter bullshit. it seriously just goes to show you how favoritism and fanboyism comes into play in VS and debate threads.
Sorry, I meant the clone he transferred his essence into. I mean if palpatine was strong in his original body, he must certainly be stronger in a much younger body, right?
Perhaps, still I'm far more of a fair and unbiased debater than some people on here, at least I don't create on sided threads(I'm not accusing you), and if you want to bring up my Zayne Vs Barsen'thor thread I will gladly admit I was wrong and now have a broader perspective on the Barsen'thor, all thanks to Nephthys and her/his being able to put up with my foolish and stupid assumptions . Still I'm far more reasonable and civil than most people on here, at least I don't call people "shitheads" because their opinions differ from mine. For example while I am a "Revanite" and will be the first(or probably second if Ant is on) to jump to the defense of Revan's over all prowess and skill, however much like my good friend Ant I will also be the first(or second) to point some of Revan's major flaws, whether he's up against some strong foes like, Count Dooku, Yoda or Emperor palpatine or if going up against far less impressive foes like, Asajj Ventress, Qui-gon Jinn or Cin Drallig. I will be the first to point out both, Revan's and Drallig's skills, accolades and flaws and I will also be the first to say Revan couldn't not survive against Sidious or NJO Luke, so if you I'm unreasonable and/or unconvincing then that's your opinion and I respect it, but Im still far more civilized and reasonable than most people on here and no that's not me bragging that's fact.
just to get a rise out of all of us dude, all Jack wants is attention, it would be wise of us to ignore him. After all it is the only reason he keeps coming back. Just ignore him, remember. "DFTT- Don't. Feed. The. Troll".
Apr 21st, 2014 06:58 AM
