quote: (post)

Originally posted by ILS
You're not wrong in some cases, but 1% is kind of a huge generalisation. That said, with the way things are looking, it may not be long before we truly descend into darkness.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Answer your PM instead, curiosity is killing me.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by ILS
You're not wrong in some cases, but 1% is kind of a huge generalisation. That said, with the way things are looking, it may not be long before we truly descend into darkness.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by ILS
Well since no one else will I'll give it a shot before I get out of here. I wanna get my shit together in other places so we'll do this sometime mid-February. Link me to this Kelvin trilogy on wikipedia.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by MythLord
But if they are countered and you just regurgitate them and say: "Herr, I win, you loose!" then they do need a change.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Beniboybling
looking forward to it, yeah.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by ILS
Just got to thinking. While debating the most boneheaded mother****er ever on Comic Vine (kbroskywalker) I realised something interesting; the fact this guy was simultaneously so bad at debating and so inevitably fixed into one way of thinking, it forced him to constantly make his arguments and attack his opponents from new angles. The sheer plethora of methods he can come up with to carry on an obviously failing battle on his part is at least impressive but probably some kind of legendary feat. So, perhaps logic dictates that the longer he tries, the more likely he is to stumble upon a better argument?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
whats comicvine btw?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
People should work on their bias arguments on here more than, b/c only a hand full of people here can actually debate.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Yeah, the anti-Bane sentiment was the fire that forged me into the monster I am today.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Geistalt
http://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/battles-7/

quote: (post)

Originally posted by ILS
Just got to thinking. While debating the most boneheaded mother****er ever on Comic Vine (kbroskywalker) I realised something interesting; the fact this guy was simultaneously so bad at debating and so inevitably fixed into one way of thinking, it forced him to constantly make his arguments and attack his opponents from new angles. The sheer plethora of methods he can come up with to carry on an obviously failing battle on his part is at least impressive but probably some kind of legendary feat. So, perhaps logic dictates that the longer he tries, the more likely he is to stumble upon a better argument?

If you're impartial (lol), and don't feel particularly passionate about reaching a certain conclusion (elevating particular characters, establishing certain rules for everyone else to follow in debates), chances are you won't rack your brains thinking of new ways to prove your point. You might do the only sane thing and move on (which soon I'm going to do, but for now you all still have me hooked).

So am I onto something or is this more resident shrink ILS bullshit? I know my prime directive since day 1 has been give Maul the best goddamn case you can while making as few logical blunders as possible, among others, and I'd be lying if I said I hadn't cycled out a few shit arguments in favour of better ones along the way. But what about others, or yourself?