Lmfao Bane/Malgus/Revan/Plagueis don't have any feats in Disney canon dude. All their feats are in the EU, so you have to use Sidious' EU feats (which are vastly superior) when comparing.
Only books printed after Disney aquired the rights to in 2014 are canon. Plagueis and bane novels are explicitly non canon.
Anyway, Azronger from the star wars forum put together an excellent palpatine respect thread a little while ago. For anyone interested I'll post a link.
Its obvious you havent understood what i was talking about al this long time.
I am comparing EU feats of Plaeguis/Bane/Malgus/Revan with Movie Sidious.
Why? Because there are theories that Disney is planning to use an Old Sith as Snoke. Therefore its possible that Disney makes EU feats of such Sith Canon. Get me?
Plaeguis was referenced in SW3 so he is canon.
Bane was referenced in the CW show so he is also Canon.
So Palpatine still shouldnt be considered the best.
Lol it's not like Snoke would get their EU feats if it turns out he's one of them. Disney is completely scrapping the EU. What you originally said is that Malgus Bane and Plagueis are WAY STRONGER than Sidious. Which they aren't. EU feats or canon feats, Sidious is better.
This was your argument the whole time? Comparing their EU feats to what we see Sidious do on-screen? What the actual f**k?
If they did make Snoke any one of those characters (which he isn't, by the way, and the theory that he could be any of those 3 characters is, quite frankly, retarded), why the hell would you think they would just give them all their EU feats in canon as well? Sidious doesn't have all of his EU feats in canon, this is a retarded argument you're making, honestly. Comparing EU to canon is stupid, what a waste of time. Stupid argument, stupid theory.
By the way, Old Republic EU feats became Legends after Disney took over. Doesnt mean Disney cant canon the information later on. So the only one being stupid here is you.
Any feat from Sidious that happens outside the movies or after E6 are NON CANON due to the fact that the movies contradict such information.
For instance, the fact that Dark Empire happens after E6, but E7 contradicted that info means that Dark Empire is DEFINETLY non canon.
So again, limitting Sidious to movie feats only isnt stupid.
It doesn't matter because it's not canon now, so you can't compare any of it to Sidious. And even if you could, Sidious' canon feats still shit on their EU feats lmao. What have any of them done that compares to fighting equally with Yoda (and debatably beating him), blitzing 3 Jedi masters or beating Maul and Opress?
You didn't make it clear in your first few posts, and the fact that that was your argument anyway doesn't make it any less stupid. Oh, don't worry, I won't be reading your posts from now on, you seem to have the mental capacity of a tree stump
So, to sum up, the argument in favour of Sidious being superior is various canonical screen feats, statements and other bits of info. The argument for the other guys hedges on a fan theory being correct and assuming Disney will potentially assign currently non-canonical feats to people at some point in the future? Seems legit lol.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 18th, 2017 02:07 AM
