Quantum of Solace Review
by Homer Yen (homeryen88 AT gmail DOT com)November 18th, 2008
"Quantum" Provides Only Marginal Solace
by Homer Yen
(c) 2008
Ok, I like James Bond. I really like James Bond. Just hearing the words evokes a certain picture in your mind. And it's more than just a vision of the rugged Daniel Craig. It's a picture of being in command yet having insouciance. It's a picture of being suave and yet being a rogue. I can't really describe it with words. But, if you're following me along so far, then you know what I mean. So far so good. But, something went awry with "Quantum of Solace". As an action film, it's fine. But as a James Bond film, I just want to ask: where did James Bond go?
What's the best way to sum up this movie? The movie's DNA seems to be a mixture of "Charlie Wilson's War" (but bereft of anything lighthearted) and anything that featured Jason Bourne. There are essentially two forgettable villains. One looks to stage a coup and usurp the Presidency in Bolivia. The other is looking to establish control of the water utilities of that country. There is some banter about dictatorships and oil interests and other geopolitical musings. Completely uninteresting to me.
The real meat of the film is supposed to stem from a desire for revenge. "Quantum of Solace" picks up from the previous film with Bond looking to avenge the death of his lover. The Bond Girl, in this installment, is Camille (Olga Kurylenko) who also harbors a wish to avenge the death of her father. You know, I can't even really say that she can be labeled The Bond Girl, because it never appears that this Bond has any interest in her as a meaningful pursuit or as a disposable pleasure. For both Bond and Camille to reach their intended targets, they both have to go through Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), who is a ruthless businessman but is one of the wimpiest villains of the Bond franchise.
In a recent article, Bond Alum Roger Moore expressed his concern that James Bond films were becoming too violent. I think that the James Bond character evolves as the pop culture mindset of today's moviegoer evolves. Just look at how "The Dark Knight" completely transformed the Batman image. But, that film adjusted correctly to the changing times. I don't think that Bond is supposed to change. Sean Connery started out with 80% charm and 20% menace. Today, Daniel Craig, the fine actor that he is, is 20% charm and 80% menace.
Yes, this film does honor the first generation Bond. One scene is very reminiscent of Goldfinger. And a new global network of villains is emerging in the vein of SPECTRE. But a lot of what makes James Bond fun has been discarded, at least for this film. How about the tongue-in-cheek lines? Remember when Pierce Brosnan miraculously saved himself from going over a cliff by latching on to a bell? His response: "Heh, saved by the bell!" Classic! How about the crazy Bond Girl names like Pussy Galore or Jenny Flex. Here, the girl's name is just Camille, which sounds like a type of tea. Where's the fun in that? And, where's Q and the gadgets? This is like watching X-Men without Wolverine and Dr. Xavier.
Nonetheless, if you have a penchant for action, there is plenty of that here. Bond outmaneuvers pursuers in his Aston Martin, outmaneuvers pursuers in a speedboat, and even outmaneuvers pursuers in a clunky plane. And while he is very good at commandeering vehicles, I missed the simpler times when he could charm a woman into bed with him or just order an often-overlooked brand of wine to compliment the chateaubriand. This newer and grittier Bond is a workhorse. But all work and no play makes James a dull boy.
Grade: C+
S: 1 out of 3
L: 0 out of 3
V: 2 out of 3
More on 'Quantum of Solace'...
Originally posted in the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup. Copyright belongs to original author unless otherwise stated. We take no responsibilities nor do we endorse the contents of this review.
