Originally posted by Creshosk
Nope, I already proved my point. 🙂
Originally posted by Creshosk
You're a Retard, you speak Retard.
Originally posted by Creshosk
I'm a cunning linguist. That's how I can communicate with you.
Spider-Man wins.
313
Originally posted by Badabing
You totally missed his point. crylaugh
He had one?
Oh yeah... I think it was this:
English being both the person and the language
My post showed the fallacies in that assessment.
Also...
Originally posted by Badabing
dur off! I wasn't talking to you. Stop acting like a durbaby
Originally posted by Air LegendThe ironic thing is that... or well, no, not ironic... but the funny thing is you inadvertently admit your ignorance in saying that "you hear" that ignorance is bliss.
I hear ignorance is bliss.
Originally posted by Air LegendCause I'm using preexisting words, "You are a Retard". Retards exist already. You attempted to say that I was speaking a language that was beyond your grasp of understanding. Showing you weren't smart enough to know how to look past how the point is presented, to see what is actually being said.
So you can make up your own demonym and language, but I can't make up my own word 😐
Originally posted by Air LegendHey, I wouldn't insult your sex life if you had one. 313
😆 Keep dreaming, keep dreaming.
Originally posted by Air LegendHow?
Spider-Man wins.313
Originally posted by Creshosk
The ironic thing is that... or well, no, not ironic... but the funny thing is you inadvertently admit your ignorance in saying that "you hear" that ignorance is bliss.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Cause I'm using preexisting words, "You are a Retard". Retards exist already. You attempted to say that I was speaking a language that was beyond your grasp of understanding. Showing you weren't smart enough to know how to look past how the point is presented, to see what is actually being said.
Originally posted by Creshosk
How?
Originally posted by Air LegendMaybe not the "oxy" part. sly
Damn oxymoron! stoned
Originally posted by Air LegendThanks for proving my point about you not being intelligent enough to see the meaning is words rather than seeing the words themselves...
You do know that [B]ignorace is not a word right?[/b]
You're like a little toddler on Christmas... more interested in the box than the gift. sly
Or a mouse cause you keep taking the bait. 😄
Originally posted by Air LegendYou do know that dialogue is exempt from the usual rules right? vin
Also, quit writing sentence fragments. 131
Originally posted by Air LegendUh huh... so how about a strategy instead of random stats?
He'd win by using his brains, webs, and quicker reflexes to name a few.
Originally posted by Soljer
Sure, Spiderman's faster. A good bit faster, even, but not so much that he'd simply appear invisible to Logan.Oh, and Capt, for the record - Spiderman's actually quite a bit more durable than Wolverine.
.............prove it.
Logan durability is actaully stated as enchanced beyond any human limits. Spiderman on the other hand is not.
my ignorance?
I regularly collect and read spiderman.
Spiderman durability is not beyond Logans.
ive had this arguement before. Logans body was chemically enchanced as was his durability to be well beyond human limitations.
As for speed. Spiderman has no speed feat Logan could not match. If spiderman has a speed advantage it very very small.
Originally posted by Badabing
I always assumed Peter's durability went up proportionally with his strength increase?????? Can anybody clarify?
His durability has been enhanced to incredible levels - proportional with his strength.
Even villains with super strength and their own super durability have hurt themselves trying to punch Spiderman.
The only time similar has happened with Wolverine is when they connect with adamantium. 🙂.