Originally posted by That ACDC Chick
But you're not talking about Foreman and Klitschko
You're talking about Bruce Lee and that Anderson Silva person.
Bruce Lee lived between 1940 and 1973.
Silva wasn't born until 1975.
So he hasn't even been alive long enough to live in the Lee era, so to speak.
Sure he can be heavily influenced by Lee's style and work, but to compare and contrast them?
No. It's ****ing pointless.
It's just as pointless to talk about Klitschko vs Foreman.
People compare Anderson Silva to Bruce Lee all the time. Calling him the "Bruce Lee of MMA", when in reality he is a much, much, much better fighter than Bruce Lee ever was. He makes some of the best fighters in the world look like chumps.
Not to be rude, but what exactly does Anderson's birth year have to do with whether or not we should compare him to Bruce Lee? Anderson wasn't around during the Ali era either, but we can still compare and contrast them, because they are both the GOATs of their respective sports. I do agree that (in terms of fighting skill) Anderson should not be compared to Bruce Lee though (or pretty much any other professional fighter).
Originally posted by Barker
I might take your opinion into consideration if you were American and on the 4.0 system.
I know that the engineering physics program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology also includes courses where you can get 5.0.
Here it is.
I like how the normal is within quotation marks. They might as well have put special in there instead.
Originally posted by Astner
It's not an American system, it's the international system. Either way, the course has to uphold a certain standard in order to give grades higher than 4.0.I know that the engineering physics program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology also includes courses where you can get 5.0.
Here it is.
I like how the normal is within quotation marks. They might as well have put special in there instead.