you are failing to admit the truth that this was a phnoy neautered version of hollywoods,you cant call him spider-man.spider-man has mechanical webshooters on his wrist,how freeaking hard is that to understand? he IS MAN-SPIDER because spider-man has mechanical devices on his wrist.I think I have mentioned that before? 🙄
I am 100% aware that Spider-Man had mechanical web shooters. I am 100% that the Spider-Man in the movie had organic shooters. You have expressed this point many, many, MANY times. We all get it, but is that is the only reason you're calling him that, you need more to go on to convince people.
I understand how pissed you are about it. I was too, at first. But I was able to look past it and see how great the rest of the movie was. How well they portrayed other aspects of Spider-Man and his story.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
you are failing to admit the truth that this was a phnoy neautered version of hollywoods,you cant call him spider-man.spider-man has mechanical webshooters on his wrist,how freeaking hard is that to understand? he IS MAN-SPIDER because spider-man has mechanical devices on his wrist.I think I have mentioned that before? 🙄
The only thing I see neutered here is you Mr. Parker. You're not a eunuch are you?
Originally posted by Mightyrain
so then the Batman movies should be called Man-bat, because he didn't wear grey and blue cloth material and instead had black leather and chest armor?
No he would only need to be called MAN-BAT if he had organic wings to fly instead of the mechanical ones he used to fly in BATMAN RETURNS because he would be a monster then like PETER is now,no difference. 🙄 I hope no hollywood screen writers are looking at this,I dont want to give them any ideas. 😄
Originally posted by Zephonim
I am 100% aware that Spider-Man had mechanical web shooters. I am 100% that the Spider-Man in the movie had organic shooters. You have expressed this point many, many, MANY times. We all get it, but is that is the only reason you're calling him that, you need more to go on to convince people.
I understand how pissed you are about it. I was too, at first. But I was able to look past it and see how great the rest of the movie was. How well they portrayed other aspects of Spider-Man and his story.
see you did EXACTLY what sony wanted you to do which was to look past it and feed them money which is what is really sad.
I did look past it, but not to feed Sony money (I do enough of that with my Playstation 2) but because I like Spider-Man and the things they did right in the movie. I agree with you that the organic shooters were weak, but not to the point that it ruined the rest of the movie. Look at all the things they did right. Try to enjoy those things rather than focusing on the thing you didn't like. It was a great telling of the Spider-Man story. Any true fan would be able to see that.
Originally posted by Zephonim
I did look past it, but not to feed Sony money (I do enough of that with my Playstation 2) but because I like Spider-Man and the things they did right in the movie. I agree with you that the organic shooters were weak, but not to the point that it ruined the rest of the movie. Look at all the things they did right. Try to enjoy those things rather than focusing on the thing you didn't like. It was a great telling of the Spider-Man story. Any true fan would be able to see that.
Well that IS what you did and again you did EXACTLY like they wanted you to do which is give them money.Surely you have got to be joking? it was a horrible telling of the spider-man story and any true fan would see that.as I stated on that other thread of mine,it was a LOT more than just organics that made this movie a horrible film.The movie looked like it was written by somebody with the ideas of a 5 year old,seriously.It had some good points in it like the special effects such as the web slinging scenes and and the oscorp building,and the performance of William Defoe as Norman Osborn,and JK Simmons as JJJ but unfortunately it had a lot more negatives than positives about it to be an enjoyable movie.I already mentioned how it was a shame how defoe had a costume that was so stupid looking which damaged his performance as the green goblin and how people could not take him seriously because of that costume.I dont bother reading what venom for life,godzilla 2000 or Ego Fum Papa say to me because they lost their credibility as posters because at that other site they engage in name calling just because I say the movie should have been called man-spider all the time.Venom for life is finding out he cant get away with that kind of childish name calling here that him,gozilla and his buddy Ego Fum Papa engage in and get into name calling all the time there.To give you an idea of how childish they are,Ego Fum Papa once tried to get us banned there just because we refer to the movie as man-spider,shows you how childish they are and how they cant be taken seriously.
The only reason Ive discussed this with YOU as long as I have is because you have stayed away from their childish name calling they always engage in at that site.As that other poster said,neither side is going to change the other ones mind,we've been going at this for 6 months now with neither side changing the other ones mind.I think its time to end the discussion.Either you got logic and common sense like MSFIT does and sees that he is a monster now and his character is now MAN-SPIDER or you dont,no amount of explanation I see will get you to see that was the character of MAN-SPIDER on the screen.those other 3 posters obviously have an obsession with me and bakerboy for the fact that they felt the need to follow us here to this site,that is truely sad that just because they found out we post here,they felt the need to follow us here,they clearly have no lives.
Originally posted by Zephonim
That's exactly what I think. I am enough of a Spider-Man fan to look past o few imperfections to see how awesome the movie really was.
more like how horrible the movie really is.People like you I have no doubt would not mind it if he had 8 arms just as long as a spider--man movie is made,after all you obviously dont mind a few imperfections. 🙄
I tried to get you banned for the harassing PMs, the threads in non-Spider-Man forums (Daredevil, Superman, and Batman) bitching about it being "MANSPIDER" and shit, the thread you and your buddy started just to insult me, and the countless redundant threads about this same ****ing topic. It's not because you called the movie "MANSPIDER." I don't give a shit about that. It's because you're a ****ing troll, plain and simple.
--Hey why not organic webs? That makes him a mutant...! It makes him more interesting. Why? ...Does somebody hate X-men? What? You expect him to be like '--Bat man?" -"---No Powers?!" At least batman should have been bitten by a normal bat and at least the venom of the bat he could have been bitten by could have had a gene in it that made batman, become spliced half human half bat, just like on Batman beyond! Even though Batman Beyond, some say might be phony, still,... It makes the character more interesting...
"---Besides that hey I'm waiting for a Batman 5!' When on earth do they care to even make the movie?
("Do not feel threatened, I just might be cute!"😉
Originally posted by NitrionWhat the shit? Am I the only one who didn't understand most of this post? And in Batman Beyond, he didn't get bitten by anything, nor was he half human half bat. He became Batman by stealing the suit to avenge his father's death. He had no superpowers that weren't given to him by the suit, which was technologically enhanced.
--Hey why not organic webs? That makes him a mutant...! It makes him more interesting. Why? ...Does somebody hate X-men? What? You expect him to be like '--Bat man?" -"---No Powers?!" At least batman should have been bitten by a normal bat and at least the venom of the bat he could have been bitten by could have had a gene in it that made batman, become spliced half human half bat, just like on Batman beyond! Even though Batman Beyond, some say might be phony, still,... It makes the character more interesting...
"---Besides that hey I'm waiting for a Batman 5!' When on earth do they care to even make the movie?("Do not feel threatened, I just might be cute!"😉
--There was a very prominent theme called "splicing" in batman beyond, where animal DNA was mixed with humans in order for humans to gain certain animal features. (animal eyes, toungue, strength, etc.) There was a episode were Terry was turned half bat by some evil guy who was into splicing! I'm just saying that it would be interesting for the same to happen to the original batman!..." But what you say is true about the suit, it was technologically enhanced.