My main-problem with the MWTM theory is, that it is TOO easy. It explains Neos stopping of sentinels and glowing corridors and tentacles just like this (snaps fingers).
¨
I read the Matrix explained stuff, and … urgh. It has some serious flaws. Such as
“trinity is supposed to be the mother of the new one every time the matrix is reloaded. that's why the sex scene was so important and why she was named trinity.”
This is typical of sex-scared people, who simply cannot accept, that human beings have sex for the fun of it. It also contradicts what the Architect says. In his scenario Trinity will die, one way or another, since every inhabitant of Zion dies. Also: If the next One is born around the time of the Matrix being Reloaded, the One will be 100 years old.
The argumentation is utterly flawed, and conclusions are reached by groping in the dark, or making connections that do not exist: Example Neos “avatar in the matrix is based on the person that founded the ai of the original machines that eventually took over the world. ” Because ”the disc he gave to the bloke at the door at the beginning of matrix 1. it said "disc ai" on it”
So, nope. It doesn’t work. At all.
JediHDM> Ah, don’t worry. You can still hold to your MWTM theory, without believing this “Matrix explained” horror-movie (Sorry, but it was so badly written, and the conclusions drawn terrible… SIGHS).
Oh, I’m pretty sure the Wachoski-brothers will make our eyes go wide. We haven’t been able to guess at the very ending or the middle of Revolutions. I can’t shake the feeling, that we might see Neo’s face on the Speak-machine, or the face of the One.
Man and machine will both join and be torn further apart, but how will that happen? (As in, how will the grounds be laid for The Matrix On-line?). And how will the W-brothers end the movie so definitive that no further sequels can be made?