Who thinks sueing people for $150,000 a song in stupid?

Started by imnightcrawler3 pages

Who thinks sueing people for $150,000 a song in stupid?

I read about it and saw that RIAA is sueing for around $150,000 a downloaded song. That's over ridiculous.

one dallor is over riduculus i mean why in the hell did they make down loaders and shit if when we start to use them they r going to sue us i mean it is so fu*ckin dumb i mean shit like the companies arent rich enough

heres a question why do computers come with cd burners if we cant download 😖

yeah its very stupid. This makes the record companies look so cruel and desperate, i dont even wanna buy cd's anymore cuz of the whole fiasco.

i dont buy cds 😛
why pay 20 bucks if u only want one song on the cd 😊

i havent bought a CD in years lol its all MP3s baby

Bullshit im not buyin a cd for 20 dollars unless they can garentee me that that cd is gunna be good from the first to last song

150,000 a song! geez...thats stupid.

STOP BREAKIN THE LAW AS*HOLE! (from liar liar)

That's the MAXIMUM amount they will do, for the most serious offenders, it is not a general amount.

And it is not as if the music companies made the downloaders...

So...

Does all this apply all the way out here in lil ole NZ ??

No, it is a move by the RIAA, protecting copyright law in America. Expect similar schemes to follow elsewhere soon, though.

it's indeed a ridiculous amount.

Yay, I think there is something like a $2000.00 Fine here.

But all the Departments dedicated to fighting Law Breaking Citizens are more worried about P, Ecstacy, Stuck... All the Drug Trades and Dealers here.

I don't see what's so wrong about downloaded music...I've downloaded tons before on my dads computer.

it should be like a dollar per song.

There is the Imusic or whatever from Apple that is .99 cents per song.

yeah i know, but the penalty of downloading music illegally should be 1 dollar

Oh, I don't think they'd ever go that cheap though.

they should, it would be alot more reasonable.