Who thinks sueing people for $150,000 a song in stupid?

Started by LanceWindu3 pages

What's reasonable to us isn't reasonable to the rich music tyrants at the record companies.

Well, there you go, you break copyright law, you run the risk.

obviously, doesnt mean its a good, or fair amount.

Yes, but I like to download songs you can't ever find on a CD or a tape.

Like songs made for the internet or just comdey gags.

those ones are ok because they arent copyrighted.

Actually some are...but they were taken off of web-sites and put onto kazaa.

well record companies dont care about that.

But you could still be sued.

I don't even know how to download a song off the web. All I know how to do is download movie previews to watch once or twice. I'm glad I never down loaded anything illegal. I'm in the clear. But, I think they should only sue for a dollar, that way they might actually see some of the money they deserve. Like, how can they really collect 150,000 per song. Lame.

could be...but wont be.

Backfire won't get sued. Trust me.

He's a cop.

* snorts like a pig *

i am the blockbuster police. you rent a bad movie i come after you with a baton and shotgun. Or for the really bad cases (when people rent queen of the damned *shudders*) i bust out the chainsaw

Crappy movie...

My most hated movie of all time. It depresses me just thinking about it.

And it sucks that it is one of the last things Aaliyah actually did.

Yeah, i guess that was her punisment for doing the movie....Death.

Backfire, don't get mad, but I actually liked queen of the damned. Especially when she was all dancing all sexy and stuff!

I hated it, i was so angry during the movie, i couldnt even sleep. and believe me, i tried