Sifer> I do see no where that you explain why the machines deduce, that learning about human evil, would teach them about human love. It would be easy for you to simply point to the thread in question. You can’t I see.
“Rubbish. 2nd Ren was written by WB's themselves.”
Did I say they didn’t write it. I said it was an ANIMATED movie. As in cartoons, you know? Therefore the animators version of the scorched sky can look different from the movies scorched sky. JUST AS the Animatrix Trinity looks different from the Movie trinity.
(And a sidenote: When I look at the beginning of the Revolutions trailer the sky DOES look very scorched and black to me).
“You said in a thread not too long ago that the Machines seem to be into recycling. Why would they bother when they have the sun right up above them?”
They have to get up above the scorched sky. They’d have to get energy to build platforms durable enough to withstand the strain on a building reaching kilometres into the sky.
“Why would they bother building the Matrix so we can rebel against them and have all the fuss of a reload.”
They didn’t built the Matrix so humans CAN rebel. See the Architects speech again, please.
“Oh, and then they have to grow us, recycle us and maintain us. That isn't what I would call EASY.”
The system is there, with the pods and fields and machines that harvest the fetuses. It works on auto-pilot. That IS easy. It’s… there.
“Have you taken a look at how tall the "Power Plants" are? Hrmmm.”
Have you? Hm?
” Also, I said that they ATTEMPTED to use evil, but realised it cannot be found through it”
But I’m asking you, why YOU think a machine would deduce that human evil would teach them about human love. Not why they changed tactics.
” "Man endowed the machines with the very spirit of man"”
Yes? And? I don’t know how you saw that, but I saw it in the ”creators-creations” context, just like the gods of myths create humans in their images, mankind created machines in their image. What does that do to prove your idea of machines thirsting for love?
“Would you want no emotions? To be created in the likeness of your parents but they forgot to give you 1 important thing? I doubt you would - Think about it.”
What I want, being human, has zip to do with this. The humans, you know, didn’t create cudly li’l machine babies, that grew up to become big machines.
”Again, watch 2nd Renaissance. You obviously can't take the hint - who was it who tried to make peace not once, but twice? Us? Was it ****. Them? Indeed. Who tried to wipe them out both times? You got it, US.”
I obviously do not THINK the way you do, no. I don’t interpret it like you do, no. The spirit of man is the wish for freedom. YOU, obviously totally miss the point: IF we’re to take Second Renaissance at face value (which I do not know if we should, why did the Zion database survive five Zion destructions?), man endows machines with his “spirit”, but enslaves the machines. As the machines learn, they wish for that, which every human wants. “Human rights”. In “human” style, the machines rebel and end up enslaving their former masters. Fate it seems, is not without a sense of irony. Brought to NEW heights in the last Animatrix story.
There are many themes of the Matrix. Such as “the BEST of both worlds.” Your theory makes the machines inferior because they lack love. That’s the thinking of a human, who believes being human is superior. But man needs machine and machines need man. They’re to complement each other, NOT become each other.