spiderman,er manspider movie,a piece of crap film

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z

And that is when it stops being fun to watch, when the character is so unrecognisable as Spiderman or Peter Parker, and warped into something completely different as the movie has shown.

Sorry, but you're exaggerating. Where exactly are those major changes ? For the record, I consider the whole organic-web thing as a minor, not that important change.

Something else : there are people who are not afraid of mentioning Stan Lee himself, as to prove their point and to claim that they - and nobody else - are the true Spider-Man fans and that storywise absolutely nothing can be changed. According to them, Stan Lee had this "grand vision" of Spider-Man when creating him, and those greedy retarded hollywood suits raped his wonderful ideas.

Nonsense. If you're a real Spider-Man fan, you at least should know that Spider-Man was not meant to be made in series. The story was just a single event, nothing more. But it was so successful, that the publisher asked Stan Lee for more stories about Peter Parker.

And Stan Lee did NOT expect that. He knew the story wasn't that bad, but he never could have known it would have such a tremendous impact on the comics. A couple of months later, when the sales figures came in, he had almost forgotten about Spider-Man !! (his words, not mine).

What I'm trying to say, is that some people think the creation of Spider-Man was part of a gigantic brilliant masterplan, and therefore nothing, not even the tiny details, can be changed because "it's all part of the plan and now that they've included organic webshooters, everything is ruined."

No. The first Spider-Man comic was a lucky shot, and Stan Lee did not spend weeks and weeks to deliver the perfect story. It was just a superhero story that was not too bad, but he did not have a vision.

To end, a short "review" of the Spider-Man movie by Stan the Man himself :

"I LOVED IT," Stan replied without a moments hesitation. He then continued, "I loved it as the creator, but I also just loved it as a fan. Purely as a fan watching the movie, it was so exciting. I only saw a rough cut, but it was phenomenal."
Stan also had great praise for actor Tobey Maguire, who Stan has been quoted as saying might not have been his first choice - until he saw the young actor's performance in the film. "[Tobey] was just so natural and so believable. He seemed like he wouldn't be the first guy the girl's would chase around; maybe a science major."

It's funny when you think of it : Stan Lee is much more broad-minded and easygoing about the Spider-Man movie than most of his fans...

Because Stan Lee is a cool old guy, not an anal retentive ass.

Sam Raime loves the comics and story he wouldnt have put it in there if he thought it was going to damage that movie and it didnt so I think all the man-spider geeks out there should jsut chill out.

They should, and us pro Spidey folks should chill out as well. Everyone is entilted to their own opinion.

I know but those kind of people have been invading the forums sending people private message like to me and its so stupid its just a movie and a good one at that so quit picking on it.If your not able to look past his organic webbing in a really good movie then your not a true spider fan!

Yep, chill out people, I've been saying it for a while now. Time to look forward to the new movie!

You all know my opinion on the subject (which can be summed up as "the only thing I dont like is the Goblin costume"😉 so it's time for us all to shut up and debate on something else I suppose, it's been done to death. Respect what others have said, don't dismiss them, and move on. Surely we can debate about something else.

And, I shall be referring to Spiderman as "Spider-Man" from now on, because in some other topic we have all been lecturred on the fact that EVERYONE who calls it "Spiderman" is a know nothing loser. Shame on me. 🙄

🙄

Originally posted by Stormy Day
I know but those kind of people have been invading the forums sending people private message like to me and its so stupid its just a movie and a good one at that so quit picking on it.If your not able to look past his organic webbing in a really good movie then your not a true spider fan!

other way around.if you accept those moronic changes like organics and love this stupid movie,you are not a true spider-man fan,your only a man-spider fan. 😛

Originally posted by who?-kid
Sorry, but you're exaggerating. Where exactly are those major changes ? For the record, I consider the whole organic-web thing as a minor, not that important change.

Something else : there are people who are not afraid of mentioning Stan Lee himself, as to prove their point and to claim that they - and nobody else - are the true Spider-Man fans and that storywise absolutely nothing can be changed. According to them, Stan Lee had this "grand vision" of Spider-Man when creating him, and those greedy retarded hollywood suits raped his wonderful ideas.

Nonsense. If you're a real Spider-Man fan, you at least should know that Spider-Man was not meant to be made in series. The story was just a single event, nothing more. But it was so successful, that the publisher asked Stan Lee for more stories about Peter Parker.

And Stan Lee did NOT expect that. He knew the story wasn't that bad, but he never could have known it would have such a tremendous impact on the comics. A couple of months later, when the sales figures came in, he had almost forgotten about Spider-Man !! (his words, not mine).

What I'm trying to say, is that some people think the creation of Spider-Man was part of a gigantic brilliant masterplan, and therefore nothing, not even the tiny details, can be changed because "it's all part of the plan and now that they've included organic webshooters, everything is ruined."

No. The first Spider-Man comic was a lucky shot, and Stan Lee did not spend weeks and weeks to deliver the perfect story. It was just a superhero story that was not too bad, but he did not have a vision.

To end, a short "review" of the Spider-Man movie by Stan the Man himself :

"I LOVED IT," Stan replied without a moments hesitation. He then continued, "I loved it as the creator, but I also just loved it as a fan. Purely as a fan watching the movie, it was so exciting. I only saw a rough cut, but it was phenomenal."
Stan also had great praise for actor Tobey Maguire, who Stan has been quoted as saying might not have been his first choice - until he saw the young actor's performance in the film. "[Tobey] was just so natural and so believable. He seemed like he wouldn't be the first guy the girl's would chase around; maybe a science major."

It's funny when you think of it : Stan Lee is much more broad-minded and easygoing about the Spider-Man movie than most of his fans...

oh brother. man I have said this before but it just goes through one ear and out the other with you guys.Stan Lee has no say so in how the movie is made,of course he is going to say nothing but great stuff about it even if he hates it.geez this always falls on deaf ears.

he is still trying to be payed for his share on the movie, cos he created spidey. and he did the same bull stories on daredevil and hulk.
never saw a politic sucking someones ass for founds?

Originally posted by Mr Parker
oh brother. man I have said this before but it just goes through one ear and out the other with you guys.Stan Lee has no say so in how the movie is made,of course he is going to say nothing but great stuff about it even if he hates it.geez this always falls on deaf ears.

So, basically you're saying Stan Lee is a lying prick who has no respect whatsoever for his own creation because he ignores all those "major" (ahem) changes.

Thank God for "true Spider-Man fans" for pointing out what a horrible man he is.

Right...

😛

I totally agree with Mr. Parker here organics suck beyound belief. The hairs couldnt cling to glass and metal so its scientifically incorrect. And If the GG suit was supposed to me military why not have logos and why would it look like a monster?

Originally posted by Zephonim
They should, and us pro Spidey folks should chill out as well. Everyone is entilted to their own opinion.

yes this is america people

Vengeance this whole movie is scientifically inncorrect 😛

Originally posted by vegeance
If the GG suit was supposed to me military why not have logos and why would it look like a monster?

Because the suit was being made for the military. If it were to have logos, they would probably be USA flags.

The mask was never part of the original suit. It was added/created by Norman Osborn/Green Goblin.

Mr Parker, you my friend are nieve and rude, you cant get past the fact that EVERYBODY who worked or has something to do with making Spider-Man thought it was best on making the webs organic. Why does it matter?! honestly, why? you have never said this because you KNOW its just a small minor change but are trying to make it a big huge change. Get over it. Your telling everyone else to listen to you when you your self are listening to no one and you only seem to think YOUR opinion is the only one that matters. Face it, you are not a true Spider-Man fan because you change the name to suit yourself and can't over look a small change, you won't be a true fan until you accept this.

Also Vengance, there are people from all over the world on this site, so this is NOT America.

I have a friend that said he was ashamed to wear his Spidey costume after the movie. It wasn't because of the webshooters though, he just didn't like the storyline.

My point is what? Some people like it, some people love it and some people loathe it and this thread is infinite. Oh well, what can we do? the world will go on.

Personally I liked the movie overall(didn't like it all) and will be there as.......that's right a "Spider-Man fan" on June 30th to see part 2 and i'm sure the man-spider haters will be giving their money away too just so they can have more fuel to b***h about what else they don't like.

your friend had a spiderman costume 🤨

FvJ for once I agree with you 😄