Complicated
but not really...
Originally posted by Friend44
Thanks. I only write things that knock on my brain.
When I think of it, I feel that nothing ever changed for black people. As long as it's hidden and doesn't leave marks you can do anything to black people.
I don't necessarily like or dislike black people. I don't simply usually think of it - a little if you asked me what I think of Japanese midgets... When I do think of black people, I simply feel they're getting the raw deal. It's like some people think they are subhuman or something.
The entire problem is this automatic differentiation of socioeconomic statuses between minority and majority ethnicities. There is no such universal truth, so we cannot treat it as such! Are Johnnie Cochrane’s children underprivileged? How about Will Smith’s? Michael Jordan’s? Colin Powell’s? Since the problems don’t end with blacks, how about Carlos Santana’s? Connie Chung’s? I’ll be damned if I can justify any beliefs that minority poverty and un-education are based upon current segregative trends - past trends, certainly, but not current. The largest problem, again, is that we’re attempting to fix things – and poorly.
The beauty of the idea of socioeconomic status is that it is all encompassing. It’s vague and demands close scrutiny by admittance boards and employers, but no more than such agencies already profess to give. There is absolutely no reason that a Hillary Banks type should gain acceptance to Ann Arbor or UI-Bloomington or Harvard over a Will Hunting type, but given a poor application year for minorities, just such a situation could happen. According to an article in The Indianapolis Star, written by a former admissions officer for the University of Indiana – Bloomington Law School, they annually “leap-frog” approximately 330 more qualified non-minority applicants in order to fill their quota.
A poor man is a poor man, and an uneducated man is an uneducated man. Generally, the two qualities are shared. Generally those two are shared by a third quality; minority, but not always. As I already demonstrated, there are minority members all along the socioeconomic spectrum - not just at one end. They've proven that whatever inequities there are in life can indeed be overcome, and also thrown a wrench in the gears of antiquated ideas and processes such as affirmative action - now little more than catchy phrases that allow middle- and upper-class white folk to feel better about the continued hardships of the minority proletariat.
I really feel that we (all those who see differences) should drop the whole racial profiling thing altogether and instead, focus upon the things the underprivileged suffer through. To quote Frederick Douglas, "Everybody has asked the question... 'What shall we do with the Negro?' I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone!"
BTW it's 6:00 am and I haven't slept for 25 hours. Though I can't sleep (why I'm here), I'm tired as hell - so I'm sorry if my post seems a bit jumbled...