whats the worst book you ever attempted to read?

Started by Bardock4212 pages

Yes, yes, Catcher in the Rye = good. Not bad. Good.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
It's only a page-turner if you can't wait to read more crap.

That's a typical complaint heard from Dan Brown haters. Lots of people consider his books as crap - I don't mind - but when you ask them why, they can't really answer.

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
That's a typical complaint heard from Dan Brown haters. Lots of people consider his books as crap - I don't mind - but when you ask them why, they can't really answer.

I've already stated why he is crap...He's crap because he is crap.

If you really need details then he writes with the reading level of a 12 year old (dog) in mind, his characters are drawn from cardboard, his grasp of literary techniques such as the internal monologue is akin to a blind dog (Brown) chasing a mouse with the IQ of Stephen Hawkings, and his narratives are desperately formulaic.

Need more or can you swim without arm-bands now?

Originally posted by Bardock42
I hate you. (I also doubt you can actually read)

I can't read, thanks jerk.

Originally posted by el_barto
I can't read, thanks jerk.

Calling me jerk for telling the truth, will ya?

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
I've already stated why he is crap...He's crap because he is crap.

You should write book reviews.
If you really need details then he writes with the reading level of a 12 year old (dog) in mind, his characters are drawn from cardboard, his grasp of literary techniques such as the internal monologue is akin to a blind dog (Brown) chasing a mouse with the IQ of Stephen Hawkings, and his narratives are desperately formulaic.

You're really exaggerating, but to each his own.
Need more or can you swim without arm-bands now?

Drop the attitude.

Originally posted by The Phantom
In school we were forced to read The Catcher in the Rye. I dunno why people think it is a good book. Twas the worst i've read.

🙄 You are out of your damned mind.

here is why dan brown is crap: "they took him to a mysterious hangar. inside was a mysterious black jet. he got in the black jet."

his writing is inexcusably idiotic.

Originally posted by manorastroman
here is why dan brown is crap: "they took him to a mysterious hangar. inside was a mysterious black jet. he got in the black jet."

his writing is inexcusably idiotic.

I think i can write like that. Let me try.

He went to the pool house. The door was open. He went into the pool house. In the pool house the light was off. He turned the light on. The lights went on. He sat on the sofa. The sofa was red. Was Jesus really the sister of Buddha. He couldn't believe what he had just learned.

I think I'm onto something.

Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
You should write book reviews.

You're really exaggerating, but to each his own.

Drop the attitude.

That would be fun as long as I don't have to read crap books by crap authors. Like Dan Brown.

I'm not, but you're right about it's your choice to read crap books if you want.

Ain't no attitude, sistah. Dis is how it is.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
I'm not, but you're right about it's your choice to read crap books if you want.

Crap books like Dan Brown writes them?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Crap books like Dan Brown writes them?

Bingo.

Originally posted by manorastroman
here is why dan brown is crap: "they took him to a mysterious hangar. inside was a mysterious black jet. he got in the black jet."

his writing is inexcusably idiotic.

Sounds like Ernest Hemingway

Originally posted by Blue_Hefner
Sounds like Ernest Hemingway

philistine!!! hemingway has penned some o. henry worthy stories, such as the battler, a clean well lighted place, and the short happy life of francis maccomber.

Originally posted by manorastroman
here is why dan brown is crap: "they took him to a mysterious hangar. inside was a mysterious black jet. he got in the black jet."

his writing is inexcusably idiotic.

Okay, so your saying that a person who is rich, has his own jet is far fetched? Everyone knows that no one in the world can possibly have their own jet. Although people can write about witches and aliens and so on. What about JK Rowlings book, why don't you go on complaining about how unrealistic they are (nothing against Rowling, her books are good). Why cant Dan Brown write about something that may give a twist to the story. As long as it was a jet and not an unidentified space craft, i think its just fine.

Originally posted by clearlyblonde
Okay, so your saying that a person who is rich, has his own jet is far fetched? Everyone knows that no one in the world can possibly have their own jet. Although people can write about witches and aliens and so on. What about JK Rowlings book, why don't you go on complaining about how unrealistic they are (nothing against Rowling, her books are good). Why cant Dan Brown write about something that may give a twist to the story. As long as it was a jet and not an unidentified space craft, i think its just fine.

It's not about the jet, it's about the way Brown describes it.

Originally posted by clearlyblonde
Okay, so your saying that a person who is rich, has his own jet is far fetched? Everyone knows that no one in the world can possibly have their own jet. Although people can write about witches and aliens and so on. What about JK Rowlings book, why don't you go on complaining about how unrealistic they are (nothing against Rowling, her books are good). Why cant Dan Brown write about something that may give a twist to the story. As long as it was a jet and not an unidentified space craft, i think its just fine.

Ahhhahahahahahahahaha!

You're well suited to liking Dan Brown's books.

Originally posted by clearlyblonde
Okay, so your saying that a person who is rich, has his own jet is far fetched? Everyone knows that no one in the world can possibly have their own jet. Although people can write about witches and aliens and so on. What about JK Rowlings book, why don't you go on complaining about how unrealistic they are (nothing against Rowling, her books are good). Why cant Dan Brown write about something that may give a twist to the story. As long as it was a jet and not an unidentified space craft, i think its just fine.

You are funny.

Originally posted by clearlyblonde
Okay, so your saying that a person who is rich, has his own jet is far fetched? Everyone knows that no one in the world can possibly have their own jet. Although people can write about witches and aliens and so on. What about JK Rowlings book, why don't you go on complaining about how unrealistic they are (nothing against Rowling, her books are good). Why cant Dan Brown write about something that may give a twist to the story. As long as it was a jet and not an unidentified space craft, i think its just fine.
Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
It's not about the jet, it's about the way Brown describes it.

yeah. you got what he meant totally wrong. o.o

Mansfield Park, without doubt.