Yes, I firmly beleive government is in the interests in the people. I believe the people make it that way through systems of accoutability, and I find your comparison with corporations facile.
NO-ONE has to right to assume power without a mnandate from the people.
The abolition of scoeity would be a complete diasaster, The attribution of a love of styler anmd the expression of indiviudality to some form of societal breakdown is simply blindness.
The vote is a powerful, POWERFUL tool. Do not dismiss it so easily. The power to chose who rules as is enormous power indeed. And you will find no better system. People CANNOT be trusted to rule themselves; it has been shown time and time again. They do not have the time, inclination or aptitude to go through the incredibly complex business of running a coutnry, You would not ask a farmer to run a nuclear power station or a nuclear physicist to run a farm; likewiseI only expect a politician to make political decisoins, but we as the people, by exercising our vote, have CONTROL over the polticians; it is the slant of our entire society.
Let me tell you something, HH. I CANNOT support myself. I am dependant on the state to support me.
You would see this done away wioth. Who would look after me then? You, and people like you? Who are you accountable to? Who ensures you stay on the straight and narrow? What happens if you decide to take liberties? Who will protect me if I cannot protect myself and there is no system that requires anyone else to do it on my behalf?
Or perhaps the more laudable parts of civilisation do not fit into your great plan? Perhaps those who cannot look after themselves should be left aside?
What you describe is a nightmare. What we have right now is not perfect but at least it is workable. What you want there is dreadful indeed.