Black Hawk Down

OK I understand!
I will watch my mouth!!!!! 🙂

The thing the critics need to do is to open their eyes.
The thing here is: Movies are seperated in two differnt kind, the entertaining part, and the serious part.
So the critics cant judge every movie out of a serious kind if it is a entertaining kind.
Thats the critics biggest problem! 😮‍💨

Okay...I reviewed it..Run, don't walk to the Reviews to see please!

Cool, I have been waiting to read it. the review was good!

Today I was visiting www.rottentomatoes.com and I found all the reviews of BHD it got 70 good reviews and 21 bad once. That is good.
By the way BHD has 8.5 at imdb, and that is also good!!! 😮‍💨

saving private ryan 2, which is not a good thing.

the plot for saving private ryan 2
ok lets use a actual war and make a total BS story.
sounds like black hawk down HAHAHAHA BACKFIRE IS RIGHT!

Well, I've just reviewed BHD.

I was a bit disappointed but it was still good enough to earn 4 out of 5 stars.

The battle scenes were terrific but it didn't make terrific cinema as you didn't know who died, who's who, what is happening etc. Fair enough that is the aim of the film, but for an evening of the cinema it's not amazing. Still good though! 🙂

Thomas H- please don't kill me!

You have to read the book first, you learn much easier how the persons is.
BHD has enterd top 250 now!!!!!!!yes!!!!!!!!

Here are the Norwegian BHD realase 22.3.02
Looking forwar to it.
How is the respons in England on bhd bad boy??

Can I just say that England is not Britain. England is part of Britain along with Scotland and WALES 🙂

Anyway, some idiots are moaning that it's not historically correct which is stupid. By watching the film, you are not going to learn anything about history, that's not even the film's intention to anyway- just like Pearl Harbor.

It's been slated just for the fact that it's produced by Bruckheimer but the public seem to really like it. Films are about entertainment and most critics seem to forget that!!!!!

Well to say that the movie is historicly incorrect is stupid, a since the soldiers has said that it is almost 100% correct, so there I have to say that the critics made a fool out of them selfs!
Arent you a movie critic????
Do you work for a newspaper??
I that case what did you give bhd, a 4/5?? (that is good by the way)
Where there any ugly scenes in BHD, I know that there are a couple of bad once but can you tell me a little bit about it.
😎

22 of March well easter movie then.

The soliders said the BATTLE scenes were convincing, very different thing.

A movie should never be seen as a good piece of history, this as much as any other. It may be based on a book whihc IS a good piece of history, but the film is not. Just accept it for what it is; it's not a documentary.

Besides, you couldn't do justice to the Somalia situation with five films of that length. It's VERY complex.

Have you seen it Ushgarak??
In that case what would you have given it on a scale form 1-10??

For the peole who have seen the movie, is it right that actually ridley scott has dedicated this movie to his mum??
That is awfull, he should have dedicated it to the 18 men how died!
Is this right people!...I surley dont hope so!! 😕

I don't remember seeing it dedicated to anyone..

Hmmm, thats weird, because I read that a soldier called Galentine (played by gregory Sporleder..more famous for his role as capt Frye in the rock) said that he had dedicated the movie to his mum!
😕

4 nominations for BHD.

F*** yea!!!!!!!!

Even 4 for pearl harbor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi there:
I have a question!

Have anyone seen the trailer??
'If so, in the end of the trailer you can see tom sizemore screaming: dont let that man crawl...somebody go help that man!!!
In the movie Tom Sizemore dont do that...or do he, I have not seen he do it, but have anyone seen it??