Originally posted by Nephthys
So? I mean, so what, that's reason enough to kill EVERY ****ING ONE? The men, the women, the old, the young, the mother****ing babies!? The fact that 10 or so wanted to take over the villiage is enough to do that, to commit genocide. Yeah, maybe you should think before you side with someone.
You laughably fail to realize how someone from the Uchiha clan can serve as a threat without any combat prowess. They could not risk any of the survivors spreading what happened, uncovering what actually happened. Many of the Uchiha elders could've posessed knowledge of the clan's intention. Itachi discovered that his father was preparing the rest of the clan for war. You're also an idiot for claiming that the young are supposedly so innocent, when they're being trained as warriors from like the age of 6. You don't have anything to back the claim that "only 10 or so" wanted to take over the village. Genocide? Is that what you call a tactical strike at your enemies? Killing a village that's planning to take you out barely qualifies as a pre-emptive strike.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Yes, it was risky to call Naruto back to the village, as he well could have lost, but the alternative was to Pein continue on his rampage to kill everyone in the village. Naruto was the ONLY thing that could have stopped Pein and prevent further loss of life. Tsunade made the right choice in calling for him.
We don't know if Naruto was the only one capable of winning that fight, don't sell the entire city short. The majority of Konoha's military dying or retreating is a MUCH better alternative to Akatsuki getting their hands on Naruto. Do you understand what would've happened if he had been taken? Akatsuki would've become completely unstoppable and achieved the goal, which would've had consequences for the entire world.
Originally posted by Nephthys
So? I mean, so what, that's reason enough to kill EVERY **
Danzo on the other hand, killed the frog calling for Naruto to keep him out of the way, so that he could capitalize on the death count to position himself as Hokage. Now tell me, does this seem like the kind of man you would want in charge of your life? Becuase I sure a shit wouldn't.
Why shouldn't he kill the frog? I've already explained why it was a horrible idea to summon Naruto. And let's try and put these decisions in a setting where reality along with the time-space continuum does not bend and fold so that the main-character will triumph. We're trying to determine whether or not these were good decisions, Tsunade or any of the other characters do not know that they exist in a manga, that everything will always work out in the end.
You also completely fail to realize that Shinobi are TOOLS. And that these kids are trained to think that they are tools and that their lives are nothing. The shinobi in Konoha are disposable heroes, on Tazuna's protection mission, naruto, sasuke and sakura would have given their own lives in order to protect him. This is not because of your stupid ethics or some vision that it is right, but rather because their Hokage demands it of them.
Originally posted by Nephthys
You implied by comparing Danzo with 'kindergarden politics and "bnice2evrybudy!", that this was what Sarutobi and Tsunade's leadership style was. I corrected you.
No, I compared his style to what you THINK is going on in Konoha. Your idea of how Danzou would run things, is about as ludicrous as the your idea of how Sarutobi ran things.
Originally posted by Nephthys
FACT: Danzo believes his opinions to be superior to other's, as shown by his opposition to previous Hokages philosophies. In fact he believes in his own ideals so highly he is willing to do anything to see them realised.
We all believe that our opinions are superior to many others. Danzou disagreed with the Hokages that were promoted, that's his basic human right. Everybody is entitled to disagreeing. America's got a history of making stupid, incompetent people presidents, disagreeing with this does not make you an evil person.
The previous Hokage's can not have done much either, seeing as only Tsunade was able to begin bridging the gaps between the nations, and that was limited to Sand and Sand alone. Konoha has been a warring nation ever since it has been founded. Their foundation is based in blood, what the hell do you think were going on?
Anybody with some ****ing balls and proper willpower will do anything to see their own ideals realized.
If I'm not mistaken Naruto repeated PAINTED OVER the Kage monuments several times.
Originally posted by Nephthys
FACT: Danzo is not opposed to unethical and unlawful acts, as shown by his involvement in the Uchiha massacre, his deal with Hanzo, his involvement in the pein arc and his treatment of his special ops group.t.
lmfao, the Uchiha massacre was a branichild conceived by the KONOHA COUNCIL. Many of the leading figures in Konoha conspired to this, and while you might think it's lawful the people who make law and policy in Konoha made the decision. There is no law against the way he handles ROOT, nor is making an alliance with a foreign leader very unethical.
Once again, you try to pass something off by using the word "fact" and then bringing up some ridiculously relative words. Ethics lies in the eye of the beholder and law varies, Danzou did not break any more laws than the people involved in the Uchiha Massacre. And like I told you, they were going to attack Konoha and attempt a coup.
Originally posted by Nephthys
FACT: Danzo is actively reaching for a dictatorship, as shown by his quest to achieve power, his willingness to manipulate his citizenry and obtain power over others.
Not a fact, just a stupid speculation made by someone with a very limited understanding of danzou's character and apparently the concept of dictatorship. Konoha is controlled by a council and lone figure, who repeatedly make decisions away from the eyes of the people. What is this to you, a fukcign democracy? 😆
Originally posted by Nephthys
So? I mean, so what, that's reason enough to kill EVERY ***
It's all of this, not his laughably minor action of declaring Sasuke a missing-nin, that makes him a budding Stalin.
This is where you really fail.
http://www.onemanga.com/Naruto/452/02/
Sasuke already was a missing nin, there just wasn't a warrant for his death. He was in Sai's bingo book, and exactly what is wrong with killing Sasuke? He ran off with one of the village's enemies and fought Konoha Shinobi.
Originally posted by Nephthys
He wasn't safeguarding shit, he just wanted him out of the way. And killing traitors is common sense. Killing them AND their entire families just makes you a lunatic.
LOLWUT? I'll lay down some facts for you.
- Sasuke's family was dead BEFORE he became a missing nin.
- Danzou wanted to prevent Naruto from falling into Akatsuki's hands, read the manga.
- Go read up on the definition of lunatic.
You seem to have a really hard time coping with the way the Shinobi world works. In every nation children are trained to become tools, they're trained to murder and give their lives to forward the nation's goals. What kind of ethics do you think applies here? Danzou's not entitled to kill a missing nin or a frog, but it's cool for all the Shinobi to kill OTHER foreign enemies?
How is killing the Uchiha different from killing enemies or another warring nation? Because some kids got snuffed? Learn how to add 2 and 2, age, check up on how war actually works in real life, age and read up on some things that probably aren't in retard high's curriculum.