Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Well, "Chronicles" of Riddick means an extended account, which would suggest it's a furthur exploitation of the charcter, who is not at all complex. There's a backstory there, yeah, but he's just an antagonist turned hero.
I couldn't disagree more, you're obviously not that familiar with the character. He's so complex in fact, that we still have yet to really learn what the full potential of his powers are. I guess you're not interested in finding out exactly what made him public enemy #1, just a simple antagonist turned hero, that's a bit of an oversimplification to say the least and really doesn't do the character any justice at all. Yeah and Batman is just a victim turned hero 🙄
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
David Twohy is absolutely [b]not about the money. It makes absolutely no sense to take a cult film's character, and put him in a very, VERY unstable situation of a trilogy. Twohy's a great story writer, and if it takes 3 pieces to complete the project, fine. Considering the lackluster earnings of the first installment, claiming that the sequels will still go on ans planned, regardless of income, sort of dismisses that claim as well.[/B]
No, that just proves that they're willing to stuff more crap down our throats that we don't even want or care for. Great writer...hmm...wasn't he the one who also wrote the screenplay for movies like, 'Waterworld', Warlock and Critters 2? The best screen play he wrote IMO was the Fugitive and as we all know that wasn't original. Pitch Black also of course but that really wasn't that hard to write considering the movie really wasn't that complex, basic short and to the point but it worked but definitely not complex at all.
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
I, personally, thought the story was incredible, not "blah blah blah". It was the return of larger than life Science Fiction, a la "Dune" and "Star Wars", and it provided some great entertainment, which DID NOT rely on special effects, but a rich story and some fantastic Sci Fi storytelling. Not to mention outstanding acting on everyones part, which isn't always the draw of Sci-Fi.
You do realize you're in the minority when you make these comments? BO and user comments on these boards and elsewhere prove that. Not saying you're wrong mind you, you're obviously entitled to your opinion, just want you to realize you are in the minority. Btw, I wouldn't go as far as comparing this series to Star Wars or Dune, maybe Mad Max but that's it and this movie did rely on special effects quite a bit actually and about Diesel's acting you do realize he was nominated for a Stinker award for his acting in this movie along with movies like CINO?
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Can't wait for the sequel, but avoid the animated "Dark Fury". It's worthless and unnecessary, adding nothing to the story.
I assume you're talking about that 30 min anime cartoon? Never saw it? Did it at least look cool? Was it Japanese or american anime? Oh and I recommend you rent the video game, if you haven't already, you may gain a bit more insight into Riddicks character, beleive it or not. In any case, I think you'll find it very entertaining.
Anyway, all that being said I hope you notice from my original post that I did actually like this movie. Not enough to recommend it, but I did say it was entertaining and went as far as to compare it to the last 2 Matrix movies.
Disclaimer: I really don't wish to get into arguments with people especially not Mods, that's a lose=lose situation IMO. So please take everything I said with a grain of salt and please realize that it wasn't meant to offend. Just a difference of opinion is all. 👆