50 Reasons why LORD OF THE RINGS Sucks

checking rules............
rules checked.............
I know no spam is allowed, but the link isn't spam.

I guess I could have done that, but now it's too late.

Does anyone else want to counter the doc's claims? Just keep in mind that it's just a joke and none of it is true.

The link IS spam.

Though I find there is no reason for this thread to be closed.

well, if anyone hasn't read, feel free to pm me for the link, unless, that's not allowed.

that is allowed, and since you've listed the 50....why would they?

The list I made is my counter to the document. so far, no on post their own counter to what was said on the link.

So why is this thread open ??? Are we to talk about the 50 reasons why LOTR sucked ?

so what exactly IS your purpose for this thread mors?

it's purpose is to get me all worked up and ready to shout at the person who made it....but then i read what it was about 🙂 anyway i see what's coming so i'll just say....close kit 😛

Well, you can come up with a counter to the 50 reasons why it sucks. That's what I did.

Hmm, that seems like a lot of work ! ( and I really am a under achiever )

mors - PM me the link please

I did it in about 30 minutes. It'll take some time, but is easier if u know the movie really good.

Countering is pointless. The points are intentionally nonsensical.

And... sorry, Kit, but that was not spam.

Incidentally, BF, I could not disagree more- those people have far more wit and intelligence.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Countering is pointless. The points are intentionally nonsensical.

And... sorry, Kit, but that was not spam.

Incidentally, BF, I could not disagree more- those people have far more wit and intelligence.

okay...😑

morse what is the link, I'll put it up again...strange..😑

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Countering is pointless. The points are intentionally nonsensical.

And... sorry, Kit, but that was not spam.

Incidentally, BF, I could not disagree more- those people have far more wit and intelligence.

So what is Spam then ??? Can someone please explain ???

Ush ??? 😑

The main definition of spam is that it is either irrelevant or self-interested.

So then..according to that guideline...

If I make a thread that is relevant to Lord of Rings, and post a URL that pertains to that thread...it is okay...

...but I cannot be interested in this thread...or else it could be SPAM ????

(wow, that was clear as mud )

Originally posted by Ushgarak
The main definition of spam is that it is either irrelevant or self-interested.

😑

irrelevant and self-interest...well, define self-interest.

As in advertising.

You guys could always read the rules, you know...