Well, then we will certainly have to disagree because I thought those parts of Jolee's character were a ridiculous liberty by the game designers. Besides which, he wasn't neutral, he was Light Side- he was just out the job- and as you mention, still possessed with a Jedi's altruism- simply disillusioned; not even vaguely a half and half character!. He didn't 'turn his back' on the Sith- he was never with them to turn his back on them; they were as much people he counted as enemies then as before. Incidentally, everything he had to say about love was bull, in the Star Wars universe- the writers should have kept a closer eye on GL's interpretation of things, which overrides all others, after all. They completely missed the point about why Jedi forbid Love. He makes out that it is only passion that is wrong and that love is fine- he is simply and canonically wrong.
It does not matter a damn what the Force does or does not exist for- there is a Light Side or a Dark Side that every single user of the Force aligns to. End of story, cannot be contradicted. And your idea about 'balancing' your Light and Dark side points only reinforces my huge problem with the way they split Light and Dark in the game, with good deeds pushing you up, and bad deeds pulling you down, this ridiculous 'good/bad-o-meter', as if that is how it should work! A person who does some good deeds and some bad deeds in a weird attempt to balance his morality is none other than a psychotic mess- and pretty dark Dark Side.
It is completely contrary to the setting to go neutral. There is NO such thing as a neutral force user in Star Wars- you are either Light Side or Dark side, no inbetween. Now, is this a game based on the Star Wars franchise or not? The answer is yes, and so an in-between option simply should not be there.
A lot of fans have always gone on about the possibility of being a Grey Jedi for years now- that strikes me as a simple fantasy of people who have no regard for the whole point of the setting.
"Oh, I am a Grey Jedi, I can see the points of Light and Dark but I use my powers not for my own selfish advancment or for the restrictive cause of the Jedi..." they say- no, they are simply idiots who think it is cool to tear the point of the films apart to create their own selfish system that benefits them, and think in any way that is 'balanced'...
What about the fundamentals? The problems of attachment? Accepting the restrictions of heroism and altruism? What about using your emotions, or not doing so- a yes or no situation, with no in-between that almost totally sets you Light and Dark, and is impossible to simulate in system which simply tries to define your morality based on a few very specific acts. What about 'once you start down the Dark Path, forever will it dominate your destiny'- how much more clear can it have been that you cannot merely dabble with the Dark Side? Once you are there, using your emotions, twsited and evil, you are there, and no amount of trying to do good actions to gain silly Light Side 'points' will change that! And aside from anything else... what about the fact that George Lucas has simply STATED there are two sides of the Force, and so anyone who tries to make out otherwise is simply incorrect...
Galaxies looks pretty hopeless to me; KOTOR is the serious sort of game but they blatantly overdid the force powers in it relative to the powers that exist in the films.
Lightning is not a big problem save that it is too easy to get but half the powers are just silly! You don't need stasis holding powers (bane of any game) and 'destroy droid' (which made portions of the game ludicrously easy) to simulate the Star Was force system!
Now, none of this matters in a mere computer game except that I LIKE my Star Wars games to remain relatively true to the source material rather than shoot off with their own very different takes on how SW should work. For my liking, KOTOR was too far in that direction with its comments on love, ludicrously simplified morality system (not actually worse than Jedi Knight's but it SEEMED worse because they were trying to be so much more serious about it) and cortosis weaponry, and I would rather any changes brought it back the other way. And in that spirit I think a 'neutral' path would be a disaster and I cannot more strongly reject that as a suggested option.