Originally posted by Anoushka
hmm...i kinda wish people would actually read up before posting.then again,36 pages is quite a lot...but basically,our stand is,we're not saying her acting sucks,cuz we've not seen her before.and we're reserving judgement on that until after watching her movie.and to tell the truth,i do not think Rupert grint is a bad actor.seriously,that kid's got real potential as a comedian.daniel radcliffe,in all honesty,isn't fantastic,wasn't good in the 1st movie,but he (imho) actually looks the part,and is maturing along with the role,which is rather wroking out both for him and the movies.emma watson,well,i think she's good as a know-it-all,but am yet to see her in other roles,as well as radcliffe,so i'm reserving any complete judgement on both of them.as for tom felton,IMO,he can really pull of the villain well - that snarl😱 and the contempt in his voice!good stuff 😊
so,your statement - aside from the fact that it's absolute generalisation - isn't valid.plus,if you say all child actors suck,you add in macaulay(sp?) culkin,dakota fanning,drew barrymore,shirley temple and many more.
and as for her looks,our stand is that she doesn't fit the part,because,as you know,javing read the books,we tend to form the characters in our heads.how they look,carry themselves,etc.and all we're saying is that we don't think that she fits the bill of our Cho Chang at all.in terms of looks alone.put aside the fact that i don't think she's pretty,and is actually rather ordinary for an Asian.she doesn't (i re-stress, IMO) fit the bill.
So,what i'm saying is,we have as much right to pass judgement as you do (which is hardly any at all - hardly any right i mean) because all we have are her looks,and the fact that she's never acted before and would rather go shopping than audition for the role, which many girls have sacrificed loads for.
please don't take any of this as a personal attack 🙂
Perfect, m'dear 😊