Beast Vs Sabertooth

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Cybermaster, in order to continue debating here, you're going to have to learn yourself in the ways of comics. Just the basics please.

Sabretooth = Not Nightcrawler's father
Colossus = Class 100

I'm sure there's more, too. Just let us know if you have a question. Just don't ask wolverine8888. He'll tell you that Wolverine can hold his own against Galactus.

funny. seeing how I never suported wolverine unless there was good proof of him doign well against to character or if he clearly ahd a chance to beat the character

Originally posted by wolverine8888
funny. seeing how I never suported wolverine unless there was good proof of him doign well against to character or if he clearly ahd a chance to beat the character

Alright, Cybermaster. It was fun trying to back you up every now and then, but you're clearly just not open to learning new things. So, I'll just leave with the fact that Colossus is class 100, and be on my merry way. Good day, sir.

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Actually, you won't agree with me, but Napalm does look VERY MUCH like that. Actually more like exactly like it.

I know why. Cuz it is Napalm.

Maybe you're the one who needs to look up what Napalm looks like.

nope nalpam looks very diffrent it shot flames ever were. the whole ****ign woods would of been on firer. again u need to read the comic clealr was not nalpam from the look of it. also it clearly was not nalpam again because it stated to be a nuke. also they make a refrence to it when wilverine goes Oh wonder why the cockrooches are dead they should of survived.

Originally posted by cybermaster
which character be more specific here

gladitor pheniox and such

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Alright, Cybermaster. It was fun trying to back you up every now and then, but you're clearly just not open to learning new things. So, I'll just leave with the fact that Colossus is class 100, and be on my merry way. Good day, sir.

http://www.marveldirectory.com/individuals/c/colossus.htm

Originally posted by wolverine8888
gladitor pheniox and such

Originally posted by cybermaster
look dude at his info

http://www.marveldirectory.com/individuals/c/colossus.htm

ur info first off is far out dated and is not even a official site it just a bunch of bull shit

Yea, I can read that, buddy. Too bad that site hasn't been updated in a number of years. Seriously. It's been forever since that site has been updated.

Originally posted by cybermaster
hahaha wrong thread dude u posted that in here by accident i see.

u make no ****ing sense

Originally posted by wolverine8888
ur info first off is far out dated and is not even a official site it just a bunch of bull shit

Originally posted by cybermaster
many people go to that site just cause u dont that doesnt mean its crap. most of the shit on there shows the same stuff thats on the comic books and cards.

again it out dated and not official it cna not be used as evidence

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Yea, I can read that, buddy. Too bad that site hasn't been updated in a number of years. Seriously. It's been forever since that site has been updated.

Then it sounds like many people are reading WAY OUTDATED material then.

Seriously, man. That site is not good anymore.

To be honest, websites aren't a very good source anyway. Marvel.com has a HORRIBLE abilities scale. They placed Kingpin, Shang Chi, Shadowcat, and Sabretooth all at the same fighting skill. While Punisher is better than all four of them.

Does that make sense? No, no it doesn't.

So, my recommendation to you is to not look at sites, but actually go pick up comics. It'll help.

Originally posted by cybermaster
ive looked at other sites to. and he his class 80 not a 100. but yes he is verry strong and hes cool and all that so dont cry man.

official mavel x-men Guide states colussus max strength at 100 ton so u are indeed incorrect

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Yea, I can read that, buddy. Too bad that site hasn't been updated in a number of years. Seriously. It's been forever since that site has been updated.

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
I can tell you now that nowhere in the wolverine bio does it say that wolverine is stronger or faster, or that he has better healing. They may both be given the same strength ranking however each ranking encompasses a range of values so that on its own doesnt mean Wolverines as strong as Sabretooth. However when you couple that point with the fact that its actually stated on panel that sabretooth is superior to wolverine in those areas then it becomes conclusively so.

As for the house of M bios youre quite correct it does say that about Sabretooth however you need to remember that it was a different reality. Alot of characters had different stats, some even different powers than they had in the normal 616 reality. Colossus for example is listed as being class 85 when in his 616 hbook bio hes class 100.

At the end of the day its stated on panel and it doesnt get more conclusive than that. Accepting that doesnt make u any less of a fan.

I don't remember a single time when wolverine was stated stronger that Sabretooth. Considering that there both so similar and have had the same enhancements from the gov their obvious size and weight difference should automatically tell you who is stronger. As for healing factor Creeds has always been a little bit more stronger than wolverines. I remember when Creed grew back a piece of his brain. HIS FREAKIN BRAIN!!! you know how complex a organ the Human brain is. Just because we haven't seen creed heal from the crap logan does doesn't mean he can't. Logan is after all the star of his book and the x-men and the hero so of course he's going to get the spotlight.Add to the fact that this was all before the new enhancements he received from weapon x. His adamantuim skeleton and his healing factor was increased a lot.

And before wolverine8888 goes of on one of his misspelled rants about How wolvy already killed Sabretooth. Look up who wrote that issue see the name Chuck Austen. Yep your argument has already been proven false.

I'm not crying, bro. I know the truth, so it's cool.

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Then it sounds like many people are reading WAY OUTDATED material then.

Seriously, man. That site is not good anymore.

To be honest, websites aren't a very good source anyway. Marvel.com has a HORRIBLE abilities scale. They placed Kingpin, Shang Chi, Shadowcat, and Sabretooth all at the same fighting skill. While Punisher is better than all four of them.

Does that make sense? No, no it doesn't.

So, my recommendation to you is to not look at sites, but actually go pick up comics. It'll help.

Originally posted by Jose123
I don't remember a single time when wolverine was stated stronger that Sabretooth. Considering that there both so similar and have had the same enhancements from the gov their obvious size and weight difference should automatically tell you who is stronger. As for healing factor Creeds has always been a little bit more stronger than wolverines. I remember when Creed grew back a piece of his brain. HIS FREAKIN BRAIN!!! you know how complex a organ the Human brain is. Just because we haven't seen creed heal from the crap logan does doesn't mean he can't. Logan is after all the star of his book and the x-men and the hero so of course he's going to get the spotlight.Add to the fact that this was all before the new enhancements he received from weapon x. His adamantuim skeleton and his healing factor was increased a lot.

And before wolverine8888 goes of on one of his misspelled rants about How wolvy already killed Sabretooth. Look up who wrote that issue see the name Chuck Austen. Yep your argument has already been proven false.

again i think sabertooth and wolverine have same strength. any ways I dotn care who it by it has yet to be proven false seeing how sabertooth has yet to show back up in comics