It has nothing to do with understanding anything. It has everything to do with appreciation.
It's no secret that kids naturally like teen humor, and subsequently liked "Scary Movie 1 + 2", and not 3, because third was pretty much devoid of any such humor, and went back to spoof basics.
I'm 25 by the way, and I maybe now you'll understand why I myself am so critical of what I watch.
Well Cine-man, I am 21 years old, I hate teen comedies for the most part, and I love all of the other David Zucker films, Kentucky Fried movie is one of my favorite comedies, as is Airplane and Baseketball. But Scary Movie 3 just didn't do it for me.
The jokes were, for the most part, generic and predictable. I believe I laughed a total of 4 times during the film. There were two parts that had me rolling in the isle. But other then that the movie just didn't do it for me, it felt like it was too little too late.
However, I did like it alot better then the second one, which was a piece of crap. The third one at least had a few solid jokes.
Think about it CINEMA even if your a adult theres big chance you still dont know who David Zucker is.I know who he is but the average moviegoer doesnt.
You said in your post KID im not a kid bro 🙄 you probaly think I liked Scary Movie 1 & 2 for the sex and all the raunchy teen comdey huh? I like Scary Movie 3 to even tho it didnt have all that in it was still funny and made fun of alot of good movies.In some way I was relieved that I could have some straight forward comedy instead of gross vomit jokes every 10 seconds.
Originally posted by Stormy Day
Think about it CINEMA even if your a adult theres big chance you still dont know who David Zucker is.I know who he is but the average moviegoer doesnt.
Case in point, for the most part, the people dissing Scary Movie 3, don't know who David Zucker is.
You said in your post KID im not a kid bro 🙄 you probaly think I liked Scary Movie 1 & 2 for the sex and all the raunchy teen comdey huh? I like Scary Movie 3 to even tho it didnt have all that in it was still funny and made fun of alot of good movies.In some way I was relieved that I could have some straight forward comedy instead of gross vomit jokes every 10 seconds.
12 years old constitutes being a kid, no matter how mature you may be claim to be, or epress yourself as. It was a generalization, nothing personal.
Thanks for the support, Chris 😎
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Case in point, for the most part, the people dissing Scary Movie 3, don't know who David Zucker is.12 years old constitutes being a kid, no matter how mature you may be claim to be, or epress yourself as. It was a generalization, nothing personal.
Thanks for the support, Chris 😎
I cant believe this now you are calling me 12 ?!?!? Im 13 READ MY POST!
Just because the director is good doesnt mean people have to like it 🙄 oh but since im younger I geuss I dont know what im talking about and should keep me mouth shut huh ?
Originally posted by Stormy Day
I cant believe this now you are calling me 12 ?!?!? Im 13 READ MY POST!Just because the director is good doesnt mean people have to like it 🙄 oh but since im younger I geuss I dont know what im talking about and should keep me mouth shut huh ?
Originally posted by Stormy Day
I cant believe this now you are calling me 12 ?!?!? Im 13 READ MY POST!Just because the director is good doesnt mean people have to like it 🙄 oh but since im younger I geuss I dont know what im talking about and should keep me mouth shut huh ?
Well, I didn't expect someone to take a TYPO so hard, my God. Of course, that one year makes a huge difference.
I didn't say anything about people having to like a movie because of the director. Not a thing. What I did say is that most kids, when they go to see a movie, don't take note of who the director may be.
Case in point, if a movie that is directed by Spielberg opens the same day as one by say, Joe Blow, the name of the director isn't going to influence what movie you see?
It's a fact that the MAJORITY of kids, being average movie goers, don't care for who directs the film, just who stars in it. If a movie stars ****in' Al Pacino, but is directed by John Buttcracker, I won't bother seeing it, especially if Mr. Buttcracker has had a string of shitty movies in the past. That's all I am saying.
You should really develop a little thicker skin around here. Not everyone is as nice as me when it comes to debating. Yes, compared to most, I'm a saint.
MY FINAL POINT BEING..I enjoyed "Scary Movie 3" the most because it was written and directed by the KING of spoof movies, Mr. David Zucker.
I did not like 1 or 2 because it was filled with teen humor which is a great filler for movies without a plot or any real substance. I like to have my fun too, but it seems as if maybe I am a little old school when it comes to what I think constitutes a "spoof"?
but anyway im 20
You're kidding, right?
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Well, I didn't expect someone to take a TYPO so hard, my God. Of course, that one year makes a huge difference.I didn't say anything about people having to like a movie because of the director. Not a thing. What I did say is that most kids, when they go to see a movie, don't take note of who the director may be.
Case in point, if a movie that is directed by Spielberg opens the same day as one by say, Joe Blow, the name of the director isn't going to influence what movie you see?
It's a fact that the MAJORITY of kids, being average movie goers, don't care for who directs the film, just who stars in it. If a movie stars ****in' Al Pacino, but is directed by John Buttcracker, I won't bother seeing it, especially if Mr. Buttcracker has had a string of shitty movies in the past. That's all I am saying.
You should really develop a little thicker skin around here. Not everyone is as nice as me when it comes to debating. Yes, compared to most, I'm a saint.
MY FINAL POINT BEING..I enjoyed "Scary Movie 3" the most because it was written and directed by the KING of spoof movies, Mr. David Zucker.
I did not like 1 or 2 because it was filled with teen humor which is a great filler for movies without a plot or any real substance. I like to have my fun too, but it seems as if maybe I am a little old school when it comes to what I think constitutes a "spoof"?
You're kidding, right?
No, I just tend to think I am little more cultured than alot of people on this board.
and the fact that you dont like sex and drug joke's and no teen videos kinda scares me becuase you think your so old that its just childish
OH, you mean the fact that I have somewhat respectable tastes when it comes to what movies I like? Yep, that tends to fly right over the heads of the American Pie crowd.
But, whatever floats their boat. 😮
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
No, I just tend to think I am little more cultured than alot of people on this board.OH, you mean the fact that I have somewhat respectable tastes when it comes to what movies I like? Yep, that tends to fly right over the heads of the American Pie crowd.
But, whatever floats their boat. 😮
Why would I want people to think I am 50? I don't, however, what I do want to do is present myself as a knowledgable fan of cinema, whos taste is somewhat elite, and excludes trashy teen sex comedies, and flavor of the week actors/actresses.
Don't get so bent out of shape. My reputation means something to me, and the way you portray yourself around here, means nothing to you.
I'm all done. Next time you watch that waste of space Jason Biggs stick his dick in a pastry, or watch the prematurely balding Kevin Smith try to make a dick or fart joke sound fresh and funny, think of your old friend Cinemaddiction. 😉
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Well, I didn't expect someone to take a TYPO so hard, my God. Of course, that one year makes a huge difference.I didn't say anything about people having to like a movie because of the director. Not a thing. What I did say is that most kids, when they go to see a movie, don't take note of who the director may be.
Case in point, if a movie that is directed by Spielberg opens the same day as one by say, Joe Blow, the name of the director isn't going to influence what movie you see?
It's a fact that the MAJORITY of kids, being average movie goers, don't care for who directs the film, just who stars in it. If a movie stars ****in' Al Pacino, but is directed by John Buttcracker, I won't bother seeing it, especially if Mr. Buttcracker has had a string of shitty movies in the past. That's all I am saying.
You should really develop a little thicker skin around here. Not everyone is as nice as me when it comes to debating. Yes, compared to most, I'm a saint.
Im not a majority of other kids 🙄
Ill see a movie for Spielberg the the second reason why I saw A.I.
Ill watch a movie for John Woo the 3rd reason I saw MI:2 AND the second why I saw PayCheck.
Would you please stop comparing me to the average teenager who likes the raunchy comedies about sex and drugs and gross humor and stop to think that even tho I may be young I know a good flick when I see it?
For the love of God, let me present a very simple case for what CinemAddiction is trying to say.
I'm going to list six comedies that are considered to have plenty of "adult humor" in them. I'm not saying I like or dislike any of the ones in either category, but this is just an explanation.
Category 1
Scary Movie
American Pie
Road Trip
Category 2
Caddyshack
Vacation
Stripes
Besides the fact that the ones in Category 2 are older films (hey, they might tell you something in itself), how do the two Categories differ? Term paper due this Friday. 😉