Originally posted by JacopeX
Ah, so it's me that misinterpreted?Problem is, I misinterpreted no one. I made a standard comment that was did not quote anyone. I was not even trying to stay on the topic of the argument but more of the general idea.
You have misinterpreted me. More than once. Now could you tell me what I've done to you?
You weren't kidding? THAT was the reason to why you were rude towards me?
And I'm pretty certain I'd know best if you've understood what I meant or not. You don't know what I was thinking when I was writing what I wrote. It's like I'd tell you that you aren't '91, you're actually '93.
You have misunderstood me massively. That's all there's to say on that. You haven't at all understood what I've been saying.
That because I dont think he understands anything of what anyone says. At least thats how it seems, so far as I learned during my time in this part of the site.
Rips our words in to pieces, puts them all into single quotes and attempts to completely change how we sound and change what we are actually saying.
Then try's to act off like if we are bad people or something. 🙁
Originally posted by Etna
Rips our words in to pieces, puts them all into single quotes and attempts to completely change how we sound and change what we are actually saying.
Sounds like the "Strawman" fallacy.
Originally posted on Wikipedia
A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"😉, and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position
Or in layman's terms: Take a claim someone made, change it's meaning slightly (make a "strawman out of it), and then argue against the "strawman" instead of the actual claim.
Because you are all arguing about the wrong thing...I can care less about the your sentimental issues with the things I say or how I express myself because that will not be changed. Not in real life, so how can I change online?
How about we get back on topic rather than directing the argument towards me. I have a few justified reasons to just quote one part of your posts. If you have seen how I have quoted Marie's posts in the UHRP thread, I quote the whole post because it was based on one subject. You have pulled a 180 on me directed this whole argument towards my expressions. And that is not really my forte so sorry to burst all your bubbles. 😛
I won't be ridiculed because of my interest in a topic. I don't see how anyone would want to put themselves out for you to make fun of, simply because they want to share their opinions on a matter. It has become abundantly clear to me that you're just plain rude and has no actual reason for being so towards me.
For that reason, I have no further interest in discussing anything with you. I don't like being made fun of for something I love, so I'll just go ahead and avoid the topic all together and just not give you the opportunity to demean me for my thoughts.
I reached out so that we could get along and sort out any misunderstanding there might have been between us and cease unnecessary hostility you have come to display against me, but you don't want to do this and I'll take that as sign enough that my opinions aren't welcome in your world. Your mind is set to not liking the way I think, and that's that.
You've won, whatever victory there is in winning through humiliation. A peculiar victory, though, as I never considered it a contest. Why you did, I'll probably never understand.
I just hope you stop being rude one day.
Originally posted by Q'AniliaAnd here I thought you have made any consideration to what you have really said in your original post about Logic in Fantasy with the use of Pseudo Logic. You refuse to consider that and rather put your attention to my tone when it is far from the point we both were supposed to discuss.
I won't be ridiculed because of my interest in a topic. I don't see how anyone would want to put themselves out for you to make fun of, simply because they want to share their opinions on a matter. It has become abundantly clear to me that you're just plain rude and has no actual reason for being so towards me.
Meh, but at this point there is nothing more to expect.
Originally posted by Q'AniliaHow can I make fun of you for having an interest for something I have an interest in as well? We just have our share of differences upon it where we philosophize the text based world differently.
For that reason, I have no further interest in discussing anything with you. I don't like being made fun of for something I love, so I'll just go ahead and avoid the topic all together and just not give you the opportunity to demean me for my thoughts.
The only justifiable reason for my harsh perception is your very outrageous claim you call "logic" in fantasy. And it angered me even more on how you claimed to be the victor of the argument like a child, as if you were trying to test my patience with a challenge by patronizing my indirect claim. There is no other way to put it.
Originally posted by Q'AniliaNo, it's the fact that you choose to sound like a pretentious individual with superior outlook of your own "RPing vision" in comparison to others who understand something you don't. Therefore, I gave you the suggestion to leave the RP since most the RPers fall into your negative category.
I reached out so that we could get along and sort out any misunderstanding there might have been between us and cease unnecessary hostility you have come to display against me, but you don't want to do this and I'll take that as sign enough that my opinions aren't welcome in your world. Your mind is set to not liking the way I think, and that's that.
Originally posted by Q'AniliaSo you admit this all about winning to you. 😂
You've won, whatever victory there is in winning through humiliation. A peculiar victory, though, as I never considered it a contest. Why you did, I'll probably never understand.
I am not here to win a little mickey mouse argument where I have to prove something wrong to be wrong. I have only presented my points the best I can without irritating myself further through such irrational presentation of an argument...
Funny how you accuse me of misinterpretation as you misinterpreted my sig as a representation of my personality. I call that shallow and idiotic...Kinda makes you a hypocrite, whereas you have exposed a few things to me have aggravated me further. Yet you have the friggin nerve to believe you are alright? LOL!
Thanks, you have told me a thing or two about yourself.
By now, you should understand how you have irritated me...If not, then just get over yourself and move on. I'm sure I'm not the first in your list of daily things to accomplish day to day. 🙄
Originally posted by Q'AniliaIf you got to know me better with a better impression out of yourself, i'm not such a bad guy.
I just hope you stop being rude one day.
Originally posted by EtnaFunny how this is coming from a shallow individual who passed a concluding judgment based off a joke profile and a sig that quoted something off a song.
damn Jacope, your a complete douche with such bigotry behavior
You're so perfect!
Originally posted by Etna1) My first ban were based on mod baiting. Blame inadequacy over my actions. The second ban was an indirect criticism. I have yet to have found a rule against that. 🙄
It is no wonder you have been banned before. You can't do something so simple as apologize to Q for going out of hand.
Way I see it, you went out of hand and now you can't admit your wrong doing.
2) I don't have to apologize to someone with such a sorry ass claim. It's so obvious the purpose was meant to satisfy her own correct ways. others would have reacted the same way as me if they have really read that post that quoted me.
3) The way you see it is totally in favor of her for not even considering anything I have presented towards. Did you even read what I argued against. If you did and agreed, then you are just as terrible in terms of understanding of fiction and logic.
Originally posted by JacopeX
Funny how this is coming from a shallow individual who passed a concluding judgment based off a joke profile and a sig that quoted something off a song.
<.< Are you acting stupid or are you actually this dumb?
I never concluded and called you anything based on your so called 'joke profile' or a sig that was to lazy to even say it was based off a song.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=12941225&highlight=userid%3A119485#post12941225
I already explained myself there and corrected you for your idiocy.
You still don't know the word judge... Stop using words without knowing them first
Originally posted by JacopeX
The way you see it is totally in favor of her for not even considering anything I have presented towards. Did you even read what I argued against. If you did and agreed, then you are just as terrible in terms of understanding of fiction and logic.
Yes I have read... Whether I agree with one or the other about that topic has 'nothing' to do with what we are talking about.
She wanted to have a normal conversation and debate about an interesting topic, and then you started flipping off personal attacks towards her. She ended the conversation because you turned it personal and got angry for no reason.
If you still see this conversation is about fiction, then you are not very smart...
This individual is a total waste of time. She has interfered into something she has no idea about by what I am reading. It's like talking sense to the wall. There is just not function within a person like this, nor does the individual want to accept or consider.
This is just being turned into something unimportant such as my tone rather than the topic where Etna cannot even explain the main idea of the argument. Being called self loving or sounding self loving makes no difference in this case.
I'm done here. I'll let the child make believe. My purpose of talking to Q'anilla has not been achieved since she decided to walk off on some BS sentimental issues that were irrelevant to the discussion. Then it's about my tone....then my sig....then my profile...and so on. 😂
And no, I don't normally express myself this way. But some people are just straight up ignorant.
Originally posted by Etna
She wanted to have a normal conversation and debate about an interesting topic, and then you started flipping off personal attacks towards her. She ended the conversation because you turned it personal and got angry for no reason
This is as good as anything I can think of saying, because it's exactly how it is. I ended the discussion not because I didn't want to discuss it further (I really wanted to, I really, really did), I ended it because I didn't want to discuss it further with JacopeX. Fortunately this is the internet, and I get to choose who I'll get insulted by.
So same as how I chose to never again debate with Burning Thought, I've decided to never again debate with JacopeX. These two can't behave, act in a civil manner during a discussion. It's unfortunate but true, and I'm done giving second chances.
If anyone else ever want to continue the debate, feel free to let me know. I'm done being the magnet of JacopeX's insecurity issues. My good intentions will be spent on someone who doesn't interpret them as bad intentions.
You don't have to call me oversensitive, or whiny, or say I take Internet to serious. I already know all three apply to me, and I'm happy with it. So save your strength from further insults, JacopeX. It won't be taken in.