Official Spiderman 3 Updates & News thread

Started by Red Superfly114 pages

Bah this is a load of rubbish. Stupid internet speculation.

I don't believe for one second that Venom or Carnage will be in 3.

I'd say there'd be a 25% chance of Venom making it in to 3, with Carnage having a slim to none chance.

It'll be The Lizard and Green Goblin if anything - even then I'll keep my mind open.

Half the websites that report all this "news" are full of shit.

they should do 2 trilogys, 1 about harrys growing hate for spider-man and then he becomes gobby (though that is nearly done) and the second about the symbyotes venom and carnage. 4 could explain how the symbiote came and spider-man finding out his costume is evil then it goes on brock. but to please fans with villain comfrontations black spidey could be battling lizard during this. 5 could be venom vs spidey and in 6 carnage comes about and its carnage vs venom and spidey. and venom ends up killing him by setting fire to a building carnage is in then venom thinks about the crimes hes done in 5 then he jumps in to the fire aswell then no more symbys

what do you think?

They'd die in battle. No suicide. That would be too hoky for adults and not appropriate for young teens- I mean Venom would be an anti-hero, not a villain, there'd be an expectation of people identifying with him, and then they depict him as choosing suicide as a solution to his problems? They don't even let people smoke in most movies now!

Originally posted by Kontraz
there arent any spoilers, whoever put that in the title was a dumbass

and no, i mean actual content. Its just a few clips... mainly background stuff. no clips were actually taken OUT, the just erased thw wtc from the background.

what background? what are u talking about? they removed the WTC scene in the movie, but stupidilly kept the WTC reflexive on spiderman googles!!!!!! 😠 😠

Venom and Carnage wont be in the Spider-man 3. There is no way.... mostly because Fox owns the Rights to Venom (Or so I belive) and I doubt they will hand it over without a huge battle with a good bit of cash

On that bloober i'm sure i saw the GG face with a hood and a robe on, maybe he keeps the GG idea but changes it a bit.

what bloober?

not sure if it was a bloober or not but the one with Mary-Jane on like page 17 or 18

i think u mean this one?
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=300333&perpage=40&pagenumber=9

Originally posted by MaxCarnage
one more thing, there is proof of Lizard being in the next film.
play Spider-Man 2: The Game. In it there is proof of Lizard's existence in the game. (Battle arena, comic store) But all of a sudden, he is gone. He was removed from the game. Why? He is in the next movie.

as for Rock and Vin Diesel...

Diesel would be good as Shocker (bulky, bronx accent, don't have to see his ugly mug)
and Rock could be...
no one. The Rock sucks and would kill Spidey

i dont know if he is as stron as when i saw the mummy but th erock could be venom body, witha mask cromaqui to make a digital face it wouldnt bother me, or they could call the guy who done the hulk at the 80 series, hes a true monster

the lizard was on the new animated series or spiderman yesterday eh

Yeah, and so was Electro - doesn't stop people rumour mongerring about Electro being in the next movie either.

No, the animated series means diddly squat. It's an artistic licence and a cross between the comics and the movie, and Ultimate Spider-Man.

The GAME, however, is an artistic license based largely on the MOVIES - i.e. it's the game of the movie. Taking out The Lizard at the last minute means they are obviously saving him - who told them that they should be saving The Lizard in the first place? Maybe their licencors perhaps?

Originally posted by Red Superfly
Yeah, and so was Electro - doesn't stop people rumour mongerring about Electro being in the next movie either.

No, the animated series means diddly squat. It's an artistic licence and a cross between the comics and the movie, and Ultimate Spider-Man.

The GAME, however, is an artistic license based largely on the MOVIES - i.e. it's the game of the movie. Taking out The Lizard at the last minute means they are obviously saving him - who told them that they should be saving The Lizard in the first place? Maybe their licencors perhaps?

Or maybe having 5 villians in the game would be a bit much? I mean, if they put the Lizard in this game, what known characters does that leave for the S3 game? So far they have already had Green Goblin, Vulture, Shocker, Doc Ock, Rhino, Mysterio, and maybe someone else,(I haven't played the first Spiderman game). They also can't bring back villains from past games, that gets old unless they give them a cool twist. So for the S3 game you could have GG2, Electro, Lizard, and Scorpion. That's a good list right there.

Also, I read in an interview that Rami said he can take the third movie in 2 directions. He could have Harry become the Green Goblin, or he realize what his father was and why Spiderman killed him. Thus, you could have Electro as the main villian, which I don't personally like. Unless, Harry was more like the GG4 and helped Spiderman defeat Electro or something....I really don't know.

Originally posted by Hobo
Or maybe having 5 villians in the game would be a bit much? I mean, if they put the Lizard in this game, what known characters does that leave for the S3 game? So far they have already had Green Goblin, Vulture, Shocker, Doc Ock, Rhino, Mysterio, and maybe someone else,(I haven't played the first Spiderman game). They also can't bring back villains from past games, that gets old unless they give them a cool twist. So for the S3 game you could have GG2, Electro, Lizard, and Scorpion. That's a good list right there.

scorpion was in spider-man 1 game, so like you said, they cant bring back past villains

The Lizard was in the GBA Spiderman 2 game. He was on the back of the box for the game.

oh

Sly Stallone should to play his role as Venom

Sylvester Stallone will portraying his role as Eddie Brock a.k.a Venom

Nicholas Hammond can portraying his cameo role in Spidey 3.but Nick was portraying his role as Peter Parker in the 1970s TV series"The Amazing Spiderman"

silve as brock and that other guy as who?
they are worng for it.
no lizard in third movie its to early for him, connors only had 2 scenes in the hole movie;