The Suggestion Thread

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
Not to be rude but that's kind of unfair considering I (and quite a few other people) have confronted some mods about someone being a sock from obvious sightings throughout the board and I and the others have confronted multiple mods and I've got the same response from all of them which is "The sock check found nothing, we can do nothing for you, you suck" but they didn't put it that way.

Interesting isn't it? If that's true no consistancy exists.

Captain REX's reply to me via pm

"You're absolutely right! It was supposition, based on a suspicious name, familiar habits and grammar, and accusations by several of our members and moderators."

So groundless accusations are enough. No proof is needed.

When asked if supposition is enough, REX replied;

Captain REX wrote on Oct 21st, 2007 06:24 PM:
I think that no matter what I say, you will return to this statement, so sure, whatever makes you happy.

So no evidence and an innocent member was banned.

You are able to use the designation "sock" with no concrete proof based on i.p. the member is a sock.

I need not stay around this site then.

Good day to you Sir.

Shut up, Dual. Nobody really cares.

Kelly, from what Rex has told me, they're changing the rules on that a bit for the Comic Vs. section, where they have socking regulars who don't always show up.

As far as I'm concerned, Dual is another one, trying to get rid of Rex so that Rex can't ban the socking regulars.

From another moderator, Digimark, when I asked for a second opinion:

IP's are similar, posting habits are identical (he was posting in Zebedee's threads as soon as he joined), and he has a history of this....he enjoys flaunting the fact that we don't have "proof", even when he's wrong and we do (which is fairly often).

I'd say it's more than justified. The guy was a troll and a friend of whirly's if he wasn't a sock, and the chances of sockdom are basically a certainty.

And indeed, Kelly, Zink is right. Raz asked me to come up with a list of things that can identify a sock without the sock checker blinking positive, due to the fact that so many newer socks evade the sock checker regularly but are painfully obvious.

I doubt that anything this Dual Account says will effect Rex's position as moderator so don't worry Zink, he can try all he wants. Of course, nothing wrong with a bit moderating mods now and then is there?..though this isn't a democratic board so it makes no difference. 🙂

Anyway my suggestion...

Could one of the Mods maybe drift into the murky waters of the Conspiracy Forum, merge all the 9/11 related articles, the Illuminati articles and the Lizard articles, and even the JFK and UFO ones...

Just, certain people open new threads when plenty on the same issue exist, post a link to youtube and just leave it like that...

Could someone clean it all up...I no its not a high priority forum but still...please help. 🙂

Yeah, I've made that suggestion inside.

Ahh, thanks. 🙂

I just sent a PM to Raz with that suggestion also...in case it got missed...but you've seen it, thanks.

Originally posted by General Zink
Shut up, Dual. Nobody really cares.

Kelly, from what Rex has told me, they're changing the rules on that a bit for the Comic Vs. section, where they have socking regulars who don't always show up.

As far as I'm concerned, Dual is another one, trying to get rid of Rex so that Rex can't ban the socking regulars.

Originally posted by Captain REX
From another moderator, Digimark, when I asked for a second opinion:

And indeed, Kelly, Zink is right. Raz asked me to come up with a list of things that can identify a sock without the sock checker blinking positive, due to the fact that so many newer socks evade the sock checker regularly but are painfully obvious.

So far, though I'm sure it can be applied elsewhere. The largest sock issue is in the Comic Vs., of course.

Oooh, well that's pretty cool, can't wait to hear more about it sometime.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I doubt that anything this Dual Account says will effect Rex's position as moderator so don't worry Zink, he can try all he wants. Of course, nothing wrong with a bit moderating mods now and then is there?..though this isn't a democratic board so it makes no difference. 🙂

Anyway my suggestion...

Could one of the Mods maybe drift into the murky waters of the Conspiracy Forum, merge all the 9/11 related articles, the Illuminati articles and the Lizard articles, and even the JFK and UFO ones...

Just, certain people open new threads when plenty on the same issue exist, post a link to youtube and just leave it like that...

Could someone clean it all up...I no its not a high priority forum but still...please help. 🙂

Report the stuff. That's the fastest way to make sure it's taken care of.

"Dual Account" "Bob", those right there are warning flags that this guy is a sock as well.

Originally posted by General Zink
Shut up, Dual. Nobody really cares.

Kelly, from what Rex has told me, they're changing the rules on that a bit for the Comic Vs. section, where they have socking regulars who don't always show up.

As far as I'm concerned, Dual is another one, trying to get rid of Rex so that Rex can't ban the socking regulars.

Originally posted by Tattoo
"Dual Account" "Bob", those right there are warning flags that this guy is a sock as well.

Originally posted by Captain REX
From another moderator, Digimark, when I asked for a second opinion:
And indeed, Kelly, Zink is right. Raz asked me to come up with a list of things that can identify a sock without the sock checker blinking positive, due to the fact that so many newer socks evade the sock checker regularly but are painfully obvious.

All I can say is Bob is well out of this place.

Originally posted by Dual Account
Aaron Copland, the composer, fiercely defended himself, declaring, “I have not been a Communist in the past and I am not now a Communist.

You came up with the opinion and accusation of another mod?
The girls started accusing people of witchcraft in February of 1692, and this resulted in three arrests. The three women accused were Tituba, Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne.
Obviously some kind of hysteria exists around sockes on this site. So now with only superficial evidence based on grammar and general location, or perhaps superhero liked, you are willing to ban members. This again is reminiscent of the Salem Witch trials. At all the trials of the accused, evidence had consisted entirely of the afflicted girls’ claims that unseen specters were tormenting them. With the numbers of accused growing tremendously, the reliance of this evidence began to bother some members of the court. The court pressed for confessions or concrete evidence similar to that used in European trials. The court also looked for direct cause and effect evidence that the accused had actually bewitched someone. Other evidence included the accused inability of witches to recite the Lord’s prayer properly.
Circumstantial evidence will never be proof for anyone but the corrupt. Sycophants have always enjoyed making accusations. A theory without empirical evidence will only ever be a theory.
These socks must have rattled your comics forum badly. As a result you are banning innocent people.

All I can say is Bob is well out of this place.

No matter what the decision will not be reversed. Stop wasting your time and go somewhere else if you don't like our forum.

Originally posted by Tattoo
No matter what the decision will not be reversed. Stop wasting your time and go somewhere else if you don't like our forum.

I don't expect the decision to be reversed. Is highlighting corruption and injustice ever a waste of time? Even if others don't listen? I will be leaving "your" forum because I don't like it and it is corrupt.

Originally posted by Dual Account
I don't expect the decision to be reversed. Is highlighting corruption and injustice ever a waste of time? Even if others don't listen? I will be leaving "your" forum because I don't like it and it is corrupt.

Had you spent time here and not been told by your "friend" about his personal experience, you'd be singing a different tune. The mods on KMC are the most fair of any forum I've ever been a part of. Your sock was caught and you're butt hurt, it's that simple.

Originally posted by Tattoo
Had you spent time here and not been told by your "friend" about his personal experience, you'd be singing a different tune. The mods on KMC are the most fair of any forum I've ever been a part of. Your sock was caught and you're butt hurt, it's that simple.

More accusations based on zero evidence. "I" have not been caught doing anything against your rules fact and neither was Bob. He was banned based on opinion, he reminded your mods of someone else. Your forum is corrupt. It's easy to make accusations if you don't have to prove anything. Don't worry, you can say what you want we won't be coming back.

All I can say is; I hope you don't escalate things with these socks. It's obvious they have the measure of your sites technology. This is a supposition on my part, based on the hysteria leading to Bobs banning, the need for this "Raz" to find other methods to I.D. socks and Captain REX's comments in this thread.

Haha, DA can use big words.

Tired of his ranting. He is gone, on the grounds that he too is a sock, and in any case disrespecting the moderators.

Hysteria? What hysteria?

Plus, either he stereotypes forums or he has been here long enough to summarize a very thought out opinion of our board.

He lacks a life.