The Suggestion Thread

what? he's just being helpful. no self interest in mind at all.

teehee

Originally posted by Storm
Presumably because of the following line.

I don't think it's an amusing line, to be quite honest.

Just a suggestion. Albeit a pointless one, but still.

thats quite optimistic...and wrong 😛

Originally posted by Schecter
thats quite optimistic...and wrong 😛

I'll keep suggesting this until there is an answer either way...

Please bring back Ignore Threads!

My answer remains the same as the answer as I gave when I took them down.

a) The code for it was not very good, and very inefficient.
b) It will slow down the browser for people who ignore a lot of threads.

Unless I can somehow recode it so that it doesn't cause stress on the server, and doesn't slow down the browser, then I may reinstate it.

Originally posted by Raz
My answer remains the same as the answer as I gave when I took them down.

a) The code for it was not very good, and very inefficient.
b) It will slow down the browser for people who ignore a lot of threads.

Unless I can somehow recode it so that it doesn't cause stress on the server, and doesn't slow down the browser, then I may reinstate it.

After all this time, is there not a new code out there that you can rework for our needs?

Originally posted by Raz
My answer remains the same as the answer as I gave when I took them down.

a) The code for it was not very good, and very inefficient.
b) It will slow down the browser for people who ignore a lot of threads.

Unless I can somehow recode it so that it doesn't cause stress on the server, and doesn't slow down the browser, then I may reinstate it.

I might be able to write you a better one Raz. If you like. I'm good at stuff like that.

🙂

I've always wanted a look at Vbulletin. I should buy a licence I guess. It's only a couple of hundred squid, right?

Raz what's the capacity of this server before it slows. I've seen you had 1400 people on here. Would twice that load slow it right down?

lol

Originally posted by Futureman
Raz what's the capacity of this server before it slows. I've seen you had 1400 people on here. Would twice that load slow it right down?

Are you talking about ghosting? linking multiple web servers together and giving a static visitor presence on a single target server?

im sure the administration will lose sleep over your petty threats, whirly(s) 🙄

cry

On the Forum Leaders page, put the Global Moderators' names in alphabetical order. Either ascending or descending. 131

I didn't think they were threatening anyone. It seems everyone is Whirly.😬

WTF!!

Originally posted by Schecter
thats quite optimistic...and wrong 😛

Good mood day ermm

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
The Sy is never wrong, betch! 😖hifty:

Yeah! In yer face, Peev fu

Originally posted by Bloigen
On the Forum Leaders page, put the Global Moderators' names in alphabetical order. Either ascending or descending. 131

lol

Originally posted by Futureman
Raz what's the capacity of this server before it slows. I've seen you had 1400 people on here. Would twice that load slow it right down?

Originally posted by Dexter_Morgan
Are you talking about ghosting? linking multiple web servers together and giving a static visitor presence on a single target server?

Originally posted by cyber tuff guy!
I didn't think they were threatening anyone. It seems everyone is Whirly.😬

WTF!!

Originally posted by Schecter
lol

shrug

Originally posted by Tattoo
After all this time, is there not a new code out there that you can rework for our needs?

Originally posted by Dexter_Morgan
Are you talking about ghosting? linking multiple web servers together and giving a static visitor presence on a single target server?

Wow this guy was banned for using a server to post and is talking about using servers. I don't think that's the same as proxy socking.